Denied New rule about SCPs camping

[alden]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion adds a new rule, to be more specific the rule is regarding SCPs camping inside each others containment chambers, I'm suggesting this because of the recent change that SCPs don't get a breach tool until 3 minutes passed since their breach, the fact that they can sit it out in another SCPs containment chamber just destroys the whole point of that change.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[+] The change was made so that MTF have time to respond, since there's no rule about this, the change hasn't really changed anything
[+] MTF actually has time to respond
[+] Breaches more fun

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[-] Type Green players are not gonna like this

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It's just logical that this be added, the change that was added doesn't work, it was pointless, and this is just a little rule which is gonna make everything way better.

 

[Darren]

-support skill issue

this si the last thing the scps need they get dogged on each time by mtf

 

[Moros]

-Support
There's already been a recent rule change/clarification about SCP's camping. There's no need to change it any further.

 

[alden]

-Support
There's already been a recent rule change/clarification about SCP's camping. There's no need to change it any further.

Really? I was told they're allowed to do it

 

[SamPaval]

-Support
There's already been a recent rule change/clarification about SCP's camping. There's no need to change it any further.

that is for 106 only since he can mega camp it

but im +support
Camping scps are never fun (darrens opinion is irrelevant since he - supports all scp nerfs)

 

[Jack Frost]

+Support
Scps camping chambers just creates the most boring and uninteresting breaches. SCP's should have an objective during their breaches camping a chamber aint one of em

 

[Darren]

that is for 106 only since he can mega camp it

but im +support
Camping scps are never fun (darrens opinion is irrelevant since he - supports all scp nerfs)

cause mtf dog on them each time scps breach

 

[Landon]

-support

Skill issue ??????

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

Its not really camping if they are waiting to breach someone. It makes sense for them to "camp" because they are damaging hydraulics or containment boxes in rp.
also -support bozo suggestion

 

[SamPaval]

cause mtf dog on them each time scps breach

Yes... that's kinda the point.

Be smart not stupid like u always say

Change tactics

 

[Bill Nye The Guy]

-support

SCP's should have an objective during their breaches

and what if that objective is to breach another SCP, but they don't have their breach tool yet?

the fact that they can sit it out in another SCPs containment chamber just destroys the whole point of that change.

except for the fact that E11 have 3 minutes to build the Great Firing Line of Site-65 outside of said CC? AND damage the SCP very badly in the process?

 

[Darren]

^as bill said 3 minutes is more than enough to establish a 30+ mtf firing line to shred the scp

 

[Jack Frost]

-support


and what if that objective is to breach another SCP, but they don't have their breach tool yet?



except for the fact that E11 have 3 minutes to build the Great Firing Line of Site-65 outside of said CC? AND damage the SCP very badly in the process?

Breaching another scp only takes 6 minutes any more camping than that is pointless

 

[James "Wontolla" Mellow]

Partial +Support

Atleast have it so that camping inside a different CC is against the rules IF there is no intention to breach said SCP.

 

[L.Saint]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi @alden,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. Currently there is a similar rule in place which prevents SCPs from 'camping' in locations to prolong their breach.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​