No teamspeak during war

Status
Not open for further replies.

harvey

Civil Gamers Expert
Feb 3, 2021
121
32
91
[B]What does this suggestion change/add/remove:[/
Code:
Somehow make it so teamspeak goes off during work time so during war enhances roleplay and use of radio voice amp etc

[B]Has something similar been suggested before?:[/B]
No. Not what I know of 

[B]Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):[/B]
Make the server more of a roleplay server and people might actually enjoy the roleplay in wars. It will give people a more realistic experience

[B]Possible Negatives of the suggestion:[/B]
Radio distances in game can make it hard to communicate but can always be changed to certain ranges. People won't like thee fact that they can't use teamspeak to call things out or communicate.

[B]Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:[/B]
As stated it enhances roleplay which is what staff and possibly some people want. Gives people a better experience in game and gives them more of a reason to use voice chat to teammates around them. It will encourage people to use the radio they all have on them they can sort radio channels out before war starts.

I know that most people wouldn't agree with this change but it's clear people are trying to add or create more roleplay situations so this change will create more roleplay and make the server more enjoyable because helis/vehicles have to be called out in game and not over teamspeak so this would make it so tank's and vehicles don't get bombed after 3 seconds of being out of base.
 
Upvote 0
May 31, 2022
74
11
91
-Support What the fuck is wrong with you TS has bean used ever since this server opened and it was the main way peopel talk during war and the IG radio is fucking Shit its useless no one would use it and it makes playing war Harder and if you with it would be more fun then please think again as it would make air Regiments and Tank Regiments shitter and There is no need to make this change as TS works fine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.