What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion proposes that only the highest-ranking Nu-7 member present be authorized to approve the usage of war funds. Approval authority would be removed from Site Administration (SA) and Site Command (SC) personnel, requiring requests to first go through the highest-ranking Nu-7 on site.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different:
Yes, but it was lost.
Possible Positives of the suggestion:
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I had to write this twice now, so please accept it!
This suggestion proposes that only the highest-ranking Nu-7 member present be authorized to approve the usage of war funds. Approval authority would be removed from Site Administration (SA) and Site Command (SC) personnel, requiring requests to first go through the highest-ranking Nu-7 on site.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different:
Yes, but it was lost.
Possible Positives of the suggestion:
- Allows Nu-7 to access and deploy war funds faster, ensuring rapid response to critical surface situations where every second counts.
- Prevents random or accidental spending by restricting approval to those with direct tactical oversight and clear operational priorities.
- Reduces bureaucracy and communication delays, allowing funds to be put to use exactly when and where they’re needed most, similar to CI and GOC.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Would require some developer work to change war fund approval permissions (please don’t hate me for that).
- Potential for abuse of authority by Nu-7 members, though such incidents can be managed and resolved internally.
- SA/SC may not like it on both servers.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I had to write this twice now, so please accept it!