PAC3 rule change

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mar 30, 2022
17
4
91
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It would add exception to the rule "7.2 All PAC3 creations must be realistic and not break FailRP rule. (For example: Military personnel is only allowed to military clothes/equipment) " it would allow PAC3 creations marked as explicit to be a bit more goofy. They may not involve any NSFW material and may not break any other server rules. PAC3 creations marked as explicit don't interfere with the roleplay as they are not shown to anyone who does not have pac_hide_disturbing disabled in the console. It would let people who want to create goofy creations and have a bit of mingy fun to do so while not causing anyone to lose their emersion. It would benefit both sides since these two communities would be separated by a barrier they willingly need to disable.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I don't think so.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Allow people to be a bit more goofy while not interfere with anyones experience of the server. Since this goofy side would be hidden behind a command. It would allow people to have more fun in their own way and not take away from fun of others.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
It may cause a bit more mingynes and may cause confusion about this rule. I don't see any major disadvantages.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I think it would be great addition for people who want to fuck around with their pacs.

I made this to showcase what I mean. This pac is literally turning AT4 into a nuke launcher, its goofy and someone could call it FailRP.
Its nothing bad etc, I don't see a reason it should be banned and the command is set to 1 by default, so by default you wouldn't see this.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Alexandria

Civil Gamers Expert
Sep 17, 2021
89
7
91
United Kingdom
Suggestion Denied

Hi @Sandra Sussman,
Your suggestion has been denied.
We have chosen to deny your request on the basis that this would be difficult for staff to moderate, as it would require a new set of PAC3 rules for use with explicit mode, versus without. Furthermore, PAC3 is used to enhance player models and allow players to be unique, without changing the core features of the player model, as it stand this is not needed in the server.

Thank you for taking the time to make a suggestion​
 
  • Cool
Reactions: Nathaniel Brown
Status
Not open for further replies.