Denied rcpt door

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dec 10, 2023
30
2
111
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:removes the breakable and hackable door in rsd wing owned by rcpt



Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:nothing has been suggest like this before


Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):it will stop people from getting a mate on a scp to break the doors during low pop or hacking the doors to steal
I can not think of a second one I apologise

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:nothing unless you think stealing is good


Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:as of now rcpt has dealt with stealing from the fridge by random people either hacking the door or getting someone to break the doors for them during low pop I just think this is not fair on the people who work hard to get the chems and put them in the fridge just for them to get stolen by some random guy
I'm sorry this is a bit small for a suggestion Im not the best at making suggestions but this is like urgent as more chems could be stolen
 
Just today dozens of liters of SCP Samples were stolen.

-Support though, the offenders just get banned regardless and we get refunded. No reason to make the door even more secure.
Oh I see, reason i was confused was USA has that as pretty much a cl4 chem making room. then a fridge is nearby in a cl4 coded door. We have a regular chem making room also and a cl2 bio chem fridge room.
 
-Support
Disagree, we need more doors. Just put random doors everywhere. Give us a bio CL5 door that opens into a blank wall- Oh wait, we already have that. ...Hm... Well, it's a bio coded CL5 door, so.
you are wrong it’s not bio cl5. It’s a cl3 coded door which rcpt know you have yourself confused that’s only on usa
 
Suggestion Denied

Hi @Ace'honoured' ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s):

We do not believe this is prevalent enough of an issue to have it addressed in this way. There are additional ways to address this which do not involve no break zones such as fridge flags which may be requested by a cl4 member of the RSD dpt should they believe it to be necessary.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
  • Like
Reactions: Emilia Foddg
Status
Not open for further replies.