Denied Remove 860

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change?

This suggestion removes SCP-860

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?

Nothing similar has been suggested prior, as checked in the search tab.

Possible Positives of the suggestion


- More server space.
- One extra containment chamber for a new SCP in the future.


Possible Negatives of the suggestion

- If all 7 of the passive SCP slots are taken, you would have one less option for passive RP.
- Current 860 PACs would become unusable.


Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted?

Currently, 860-2 literally does nothing for the server, and only harms it in a lot of occasions. Considering the dimension is currently an asset rip from containment breach, it isn't exactly original to CN and isn't all that interesting. 860-2 has no unique mechanics with its SWEP to give it interesting roleplay, and it cannot talk. It's even worse at XP farming for new players, because 999 is superior in XP farming, and is unlocked at Level 5. 035 is unlocked just 3 levels later and can breach.

008s also abuse 860 to put spores in there. I'm not sure if 860 can still FailRP save you from nuke but if it can that's also an issue.

It is literally worthless. Might as well remove it to save map space.

7c1ed651ea8c9009da9b94e40a.jpg
 
Last edited:

Prplex

Senior Administrator
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Content Team
Donator
Group Moderator
Dec 20, 2023
645
125
21
Suggestion Denied

Hi @Caesar Kuznetsov ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

We believe this is an unnecessary change that would take up dev time. Additionally we do not need the extra space for SCPs and it would remove rp if anything.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
  • Haha
  • Sad
Reactions: Guts and Niox
Status
Not open for further replies.