Denied Remove levelling for certain job requirements

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

BlobbiMan

Trial Moderator
Trial Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Apr 5, 2024
33
9
61
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Remove levelling for different jobs, instead replace them with promotions ICly. For example, CL2 are choices for CL3, CL3 are choices for SA, SA are choices for SC, O5-1 decides O5, SL / NL decides O5-1.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not that I could find.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
More interaction with your higher command
Less mingy officers / guards
Less mingy CL3s
Less mingy CL2s
Less minge past CL1 in general.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Hard work of people who grinded to levels will be removed

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This should be accepted because currently, someone could hop on d-class and mass collect scrap to become a cadet, go on tests and do 0 rp, become a guard, kill d-class, go on tests and do 0 RP, repeat. I feel promotions will be a better solution instead of just OOC levelling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted member 6873

Deleted member 2609

Guest
Levelling still invites more minge for things that new players look to, such as officers, guards, SRU, and other level locked requirements that they had 0 RP to get to.
you can make a sit if they minge - levelling is too much of a core feature and core fundamental of the entire server as a whole to be removed
 

Snake

Senior Administrator
Senior Administrator
SCP-RP Staff
Event Team
Donator
Group Moderator
Dec 20, 2023
895
12
183
61
Suggestion Denied

Hi @BlobbiMan ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

This is simply unnecessary and would require dev work to do so.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.