Denied Removing SCP-860

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Removing SCP-860 and SCP-860-2

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Prevents lag since 860 contains alot of props
- Stops people using it to escape Nuke


Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- Can't hide from MTF as Class-D or CI
- Less SCP's to test/play as


Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
SCP-860 is never really used, nobody plays the SCP due to it not being able to breach, and not many Researchers actually test on it anymore. Removing this SCP would also prevent server lag, since the SCP takes up alot of props.
 
-support ltcom betraying the rest of CI you know it's the best hiding spot on the server smh
i'd change to +-neutral if something new was put in its cell
- Stops people using it to escape Nuke
easy to fix, just make the kill radius of the nuke extend to 860s dimension? besides, nuke is rp reset so you can just call a sit if somebody uses it

seems a little silly to remove an entire scp (with no replacement) just to solve one problem which is already easy to fix and (in my opinion) isn't really a problem anyway
 

Asp

Well-known Member
May 17, 2022
219
42
41
+support 860 is probably one of the most boring SCPs on the server, it should be replaced with something else
 

TeKz

Civil Gamers Expert
Aug 26, 2021
71
18
91
Im neutral with this, if they remove it, they should add another section or SCP that would replace it
 

verybobby

MRP War Criminal
Donator
Oct 10, 2022
393
32
21
Suggestion Denied


Hi @BoltSive,


Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion. At the moment, it's unneeded to remove SCP-860. Removing SCP-860 would not reduce any lag, and evading the nuke through it is a rulebreak which we actively monitor.


Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.