Denied RMP Fix

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Battle Fish

New Member
Mar 30, 2025
4
0
1
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion revises promotion criteria for the Royal Military Police (RMP) regiment to better align with their designated peacetime and defensive role. Specifically, it:

  • Removes the requirement for RMP members to participate in combat operations (wars) to qualify for promotions.
  • Makes peacetime activity metrics (e.g., base patrols, defense drills, training sessions, logistics support, and roleplay events) as the primary criteria for promotions.
  • Adds a dual-track promotion system where RMP can advance via peacetime contributions, while combat-focused regiments retain war-based progression.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Generic requests to adjust promotion systems have been made, but this is the first to target role-specific criteria for RMP. Previous discussions focused on universal changes (e.g., reducing promotion requirements for all regiments). This suggestion is unique because it:

  • Acknowledges RMP’s unique designation as a peacetime/defense unit.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

  1. Improved Role Identity: RMP members can focus on immersive peacetime duties (e.g., base security, training) without being forced into combat roles that clash with their regiment’s purpose.
  2. Increased Retention & Morale: Players who prefer non-combat roles or roleplay-heavy content are incentivized to stay active and contribute meaningfully without grinding combat ops.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

  • Perceived Unfairness: Combat-focused regiments might demand similar custom criteria, complicating the promotion system.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This suggestion should be accepted because it respects the intended design of RMP while addressing frustrations about promotion accessibility. The current system forces Junior RMP into a combat role they are neither equipped for nor interested in, creating a disconnect between gameplay and lore. By adopting role-specific criteria:
  • The game supports diverse playstyles, encouraging players to engage in content that suits their preferences.
  • RMP’s unique purpose is validated and reinforced, improving immersion and faction cohesion.
  • The risk of "unfairness" is mitigated by framing this as a niche exception for a specialized regiment, not a universal change.
 
Upvote -1
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.

Zigler

Well-known Member
Jul 14, 2024
11
1
41
tbh just go to lisbon bout it, he is ur reg cmd and in charge of what requirements are, talking from rmp reg cmd experience
 

Battle Fish

New Member
Mar 30, 2025
4
0
1
I was on about the gun changes and how you were complaining about autorifleman job being MSGT+
I said the promotions were locked behind combat, and you said to make a suggestion. It's in the screenshots and so what you're saying is because I asked for some stuff you couldn't do you decided that you could do any of it when you did have to power to change the ranking system ?
 

Dentos

Administrator
Administrator
MilitaryRP Staff
Platform Team
Apr 5, 2024
64
9
41
23
Promotion (requirement) changes are a thing that is handled in character by Regimental Command and/or High Command members. RMP has 2 RHC at the moment. From what I see you were told to make a suggestion about a job/weapons change, not promotion one. Please try to communicate issues to one another and work on finding a solution without drama and snapping at one another. Locked and moved.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.