Denied SCP-1200-# Addition [RESEARCH]

[CoffeeInducedPsychosis]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
The addition of SCPs 1200-12 - 15 - 29 -30 - 58 - 62 with each of their respective wiki (See Fig 1.) traits or similar thereof.

Fig 1.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
No

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
A possibility of 720~120 different combined interactions with each of the SCPs.
Cross-test interactions with different SCPs with 1200 can provide a brevity of different outcomes for research to study and document.
gum

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

Sourcing and integrating the SCP into the game.

1. Limitation of the amount of 1200-# instances which can be interacted with at a single time (This heavily impacts the number of possible outcomes for cross-testing.
2. The length of time the Gum lasts and the server load it may intake.
3. Containment chamber of the SCP and transfer of 1200-#s around the site.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This SCP would add a number of interactions and cross-tests which would help roll out testing on both CD, Research, and SCPs to interact with.

If any alterations to the suggestion are needed please let me know. If I am forgetting something or if you want to add to this Idea please reply below.
Thank you for reading!

 

["Ghost"]

Can you explain each one and what their abilities are, i aint searching the wiki just to comment on a Suggestion

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

ah yes, 330 2.0

 

[Niox]

why

 

[Cob Deen]

why

 

[CoffeeInducedPsychosis]

Can you explain each one and what their abilities are, i aint searching the wiki just to comment on a Suggestion

 

[Niox]

why

 

[Emilia Foddg]

...interesting.

-/+ Neutral

 

[CoffeeInducedPsychosis]

ah yes, 330 2.0

But you can control the variables this time :V

 

[Bill Nye The Guy]

inb4:

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

But you can control the variables this time :V

330 2

 

[Arron 'Spectre' Shepard]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi @CoffeeInducedPsychosis ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.

While we appreciate a suggestion for a more roleplay based SCP, given the recent additions on the SCP front and pre-existing SCP-330 already on the server we don't believe that the exceptional investment to implement SCP-1200 at a level of quality that we pride ourselves on is suitable at this time. The SCP also has some behaviours which are concerned may not work well in the server environment.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​