Denied SCP-682 PAC Authorisation

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Vizoplez

Vizoplez

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Two Year Club Chemical Weaponry
Dec 10, 2022
66
5
111
PAC Requesting Approval

PAC Requested: Permission to work on and utilise an SCP-682 PAC for the purposes of reducing frustration while playing 682, making their model look better; and otherwise allowing for a higher degree of roleplay, less goofy animation and otherwise. (SCP-682 walk anims are bugged).

It has been otherwise well-optimised and follows all standard PAC rulings, but due to 5.12 all SCP pacs must be approved by SL.
Pain.

The PAC in question also modifies stance, and changes hitbox to accommodate such. This model has a hitbox barely large enough to fit through doors (but does not get stuck due to the bounceback mechanic), and is easier to shoot and damage compared to the normal 682 (thus providing a DISADVANTAGE especially on surface). It is easier to spot, and can be somewhat seen in darkness due to the light glow and texturing of the eyes.

Photograph of PAC:
1683930627126.png

1683930639323.png
1683930648277.png

For reference; two sideprofiles

BEFORE:
1683931092856.png
AFTER:
1683931113535.png


 
Last edited:
Vizoplez

Vizoplez

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Two Year Club Chemical Weaponry
Dec 10, 2022
66
5
111
Using a reply for this; but yes. This also helps prevent 682 from being flinged as much when cuffed (as the pushback force is proportional to how close you are to the wall); and thus by making their hitbox this large (refer to image), it helps prevent this. One can also note it has a centered hitbox and playermodel, further helping prevent it from cornercamping and being invulnerable. In normal 682 gameplay, their hitbox is in their quite literal rump, thus by pressing against walls; you are basically invincible. This is fixed.
1683930822684.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom