[SCP-RP UK] Ethics Committee Assistant (ECA) Application: Darrel Sparks/Darell Junior

[Darrel Sparks]

I was a part of NU7 read the application

I was a part of NU7 read the document. I specified that I held that position, lol.

. I specified that I held that position, lol.

Now I havent played in a bit but this caught my eye so here we are, so i'd like to give a bit more constructive criticism without giving an actual + or -.

An application coming out to 93% chance AI written is nuts and not the norm by any means and certainly not something to glance over, and if it were me I would have this application scrutinized as a result.

The responsibilities are a tad bit too vague and to be honest all four points are effectively the same thing just worded differently.

Lore is fine, wouldnt put it in the bible but its passable for an ECA application.

Best of luck, I dont comment often, let alone on assistant apps but this one had alot of traffic so i thought itd be a bit funny.

I mean, I gave a specific example. AI detection isn’t really functional if it detects grammar and dictionary words as AI. How AI works is that it takes polished words and assumes they are AI. I’m not saying this is a job application, lol, but don’t you use proper grammar at all times?

I even included obvious disclaimers and some words are used from dictionaries.

I am aware that most of the people said:

- AI generated as an example

But that doesn’t really specify anything. I mean, I’ve been in multiple servers (not mainly Gmod) where they require full grammar at all times. Also, the level of grammar you’d use depends on the position. I won’t name server names because that would count as advertising.

I even gave an example, look at the image I showed, it says 98% AI and it is just a guy writing an application.

Reminder everyone has their own unique writing style and structure.

 

[Darrel Sparks]

Now I havent played in a bit but this caught my eye so here we are, so i'd like to give a bit more constructive criticism without giving an actual + or -.

An application coming out to 93% chance AI written is nuts and not the norm by any means and certainly not something to glance over, and if it were me I would have this application scrutinized as a result.

The responsibilities are a tad bit too vague and to be honest all four points are effectively the same thing just worded differently.

Lore is fine, wouldnt put it in the bible but its passable for an ECA application.

Best of luck, I dont comment often, let alone on assistant apps but this one had alot of traffic so i thought itd be a bit funny.

But I appreciate the critic!

 

[Darrel Sparks]

Now I havent played in a bit but this caught my eye so here we are, so i'd like to give a bit more constructive criticism without giving an actual + or -.

An application coming out to 93% chance AI written is nuts and not the norm by any means and certainly not something to glance over, and if it were me I would have this application scrutinized as a result.

The responsibilities are a tad bit too vague and to be honest all four points are effectively the same thing just worded differently.

Lore is fine, wouldnt put it in the bible but its passable for an ECA application.

Best of luck, I dont comment often, let alone on assistant apps but this one had alot of traffic so i thought itd be a bit funny.

I wouldn’t say that my points are entirely related, but some of them do connect with each other and I find that necessary. It’s like connecting stones, it makes it more readable.

 

[Darrel Sparks]

Now I havent played in a bit but this caught my eye so here we are, so i'd like to give a bit more constructive criticism without giving an actual + or -.

An application coming out to 93% chance AI written is nuts and not the norm by any means and certainly not something to glance over, and if it were me I would have this application scrutinized as a result.

The responsibilities are a tad bit too vague and to be honest all four points are effectively the same thing just worded differently.

Lore is fine, wouldnt put it in the bible but its passable for an ECA application.

Best of luck, I dont comment often, let alone on assistant apps but this one had alot of traffic so i thought itd be a bit funny.

And it was only a certain part found "AI generated"

 

[Remmy]

Could you reply to these verdicts in bulk, and not one at a time please.

We will review the application ourselves and determine if it is of an acceptable standard for the position of ECA.

 

[Skinner]

yap yap yap bro answer in one sequence

 

['Athena']

-support​

You do not have the sufficient playtime, levels, nor experience to hold any clearance four position that works directly with site command at this time.

Re-write your application and cut the bullshit about AI, we can see it, we do not care- its not our choice, but we will call out utter horseshit. Now, I appreciate you wanting to elevate your position, but your blatant lying, absolute schizophrenia to defending is abhorrent it does not reflect well on you, and you'll eventually sit there and think "why do so many people have a bad impression of me?" and its due to your choice to waste everyones time.

Revoke your application, try again at a later date with more experience and less chatgpt.

 

[Jesse Phil Fring]

Ngl, the "never seen you on" part is kinda meh, just because someone is new or hasn’t been seen much by others doesn’t necessarily mean they lack potential, especially when it comes to interviews. I followed the requirements and even asked others in the Discord if there were any specific requirements to apply and they said: "No, not really".

But I appreciate the critic, lol.

To respond to this with more advanced criticism I'd like to add and rephrase some of my comments.

First of all. Yes, being seen is not everything they're looking for but when you have that paired with the application being very ticked off for AI it doesn't mix well. That and the fact that you're taking the criticism of people in a very negative way and kind of filling up the comments.

"Never seen you on" was more leaning towards "you need to get yourself known and show that you are capable for the role" rather than I myself not seeing you on. Not being seen by one person is fine but when your activity per month is 3 hours and one of those hours being afk is not really that good. A rephrased version of that would be "Low activity".

Also you denying the AI even though it's ticked as 90%+ AI is not really helping your case. Maybe it really was a coincidence but the application itself is just lenghty and doesn't have a lot of information.

Again, goodluck.

 

[Brayan "Jim" Murry]

-support
Who are you?

 

[Mase]

- Support
I have not seen you at all
Not really the best app

 

[Darrel Sparks]

Could you reply to these verdicts in bulk, and not one at a time please.

We will review the application ourselves and determine if it is of an acceptable standard for the position of ECA.

Of course, I am sorry for the trouble.

 

[Harvey Bridger]

-Support​

Just because someone has used AI doesn't mean you should. All that it shows from using AI to make your application is that you lack the creativity to make it yourself without the need for someone or something to do it for you, an ECA needs to have some creativity or they will not go far as would any CL4 member as Creating unique RP is a key part of their duties. I don't believe you are a good candidate for ECA and due to that I will be leaving a -Support

 

[Darrel Sparks]

-Support​

Just because someone has used AI doesn't mean you should. All that it shows from using AI to make your application is that you lack the creativity to make it yourself without the need for someone or something to do it for you, an ECA needs to have some creativity or they will not go far as would any CL4 member as Creating unique RP is a key part of their duties. I don't believe you are a good candidate for ECA and due to that I will be leaving a -Support

This will be my last response. I’m not sure if you can see our conversation in your inbox, but just to clarify:

I never said I used AI to write my application. What I mentioned was that I tested an AI detection with a few applications, some who passed and some of which are still under review.

For further clarification, please check your inbox.

Thank you for taking the time to provide your feedback.

Note: I don't find anyone with a lack of imagination, strategy or ideas. Everyone is unique in their own way.
One with and without my last answer:

Without:


With, where I disclaimed:

AI Detector - Trusted AI Checker for ChatGPT, GPT4 & Gemini

AI Content Detector and ChatGPT Detector, simple way with High Accuracy. AI Checker & AI Detector Free for AI GPT Plagiarism by ZeroGPT.

www.zerogpt.com

 

[Remmy]

New Email Received From: The Ethics Committee

>>Open Email

Attached: Position Request Results

Spoiler: Open Attached File?

A Letter from the Ethics Committee

Good Day Mr. Junior,

The Ethics Committee would like to thank you for your interest in becoming an assistant to the Committee. We can see you have the initiative, drive and ambition to make such a bold request. Becoming an assistant to the Committee requires dedication and hard work, something we see in you.

After deliberating with the Committee regarding your request, we have come to a unanimous agreement. This request has been denied. You may seek elaboration by reaching out to an Ethic Committee Member. We feel that there are certain aspects missing from your application or curriculum vitae that would bolster a better standing and result in this request. The Committee does not want any upset or offence from this result, you may re-apply in no less than two weeks time.

Regards,
Ethics Chairman Remmy "Brightside" Marshall

 

[TheKupKake]

Here is an example: This is Tyler Dorkins application.

-Just a random AI detector.

It says clearly that 98% of the texts content is AI generated.

View attachment 18997

I didnt want to get my self involved in this convo. But putting someone on blast on your own thread isnt a good look,

But he is a US player, and its known that SCP RP US and SCP RP UK are two different servers, With 2 different leads.

Secondly

I’ve played for 66.65 hours

Im sorry but this just doesn't make sense, Please could you help me out? If the maths is correct that means you played 22.21 hrs a day for 3 days, Now sure its possible. But are you getting Level 20 combat and Total level 40(E-11 Try out requirements )?

Im just super confused and im sure there are people out there who have the same questions

Anyhow thanks ^^

 

[Darrel Sparks]

New Email Received From: The Ethics Committee

>>Open Email

Attached: Position Request Results

Spoiler: Open Attached File?

A Letter from the Ethics Committee

Good Day Mr. Junior,

The Ethics Committee would like to thank you for your interest in becoming an assistant to the Committee. We can see you have the initiative, drive and ambition to make such a bold request. Becoming an assistant to the Committee requires dedication and hard work, something we see in you.

After deliberating with the Committee regarding your request, we have come to a unanimous agreement. This request has been denied. You may seek elaboration by reaching out to an Ethic Committee Member. We feel that there are certain aspects missing from your application or curriculum vitae that would bolster a better standing and result in this request. The Committee does not want any upset or offence from this result, you may re-apply in no less than two weeks time.

Regards,
Ethics Chairman Remmy "Brightside" Marshall

What a shame, but thank you for the fast results. I greatly appreciate it and I will ask about what I could improve or what you may have missed.