What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Senior Technician (CL3) Whitelisted role (Non-Combative)
(With the removal of the Clearance Elevation System CL3 is no longer possible in E&TS)
To be Whitelisted, an applicant would need:
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Yes, but no. I know a CL3 E&TS has been suggested, but unknown as to the whitelisting and requirements.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
A trusted E&TS member, that isn't under constant suspicion .
HCZ repairs without holding up an E-11.
An elevated role for E&TS mains.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
As literally any other role, this role may be abused
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
E&TS deserves better and an elevated role would offer E&TS a path to show dedication to the role and the rules. A position to be proud of and a position that will put most minds at ease upon arrival for repairs.
This role would also allow for some leadership over all of E&TS, potentially reigning in some of the mischief that seeming comes along with being E&TS.
Edit: corrected grammar and added (Non-Combative) which may have been unnecessarily assumed to be understood.
Senior Technician (CL3) Whitelisted role (Non-Combative)
(With the removal of the Clearance Elevation System CL3 is no longer possible in E&TS)
To be Whitelisted, an applicant would need:
- Must be whitelisted by Senior Staff (ISD, SA or ECM?)
- A nearly spotless arrest record (2-4 weeks?)
- Good Support Levels (20+?)
- Good overall level (50+?)
- Maybe even a short E&TS proficiency test? (Multiple choice location testing "Keycard breaker locs? Tesla breaker loc?")
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Yes, but no. I know a CL3 E&TS has been suggested, but unknown as to the whitelisting and requirements.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
A trusted E&TS member, that isn't under constant suspicion .
HCZ repairs without holding up an E-11.
An elevated role for E&TS mains.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
As literally any other role, this role may be abused
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
E&TS deserves better and an elevated role would offer E&TS a path to show dedication to the role and the rules. A position to be proud of and a position that will put most minds at ease upon arrival for repairs.
This role would also allow for some leadership over all of E&TS, potentially reigning in some of the mischief that seeming comes along with being E&TS.
Edit: corrected grammar and added (Non-Combative) which may have been unnecessarily assumed to be understood.
Last edited:
Donator
Trial Game Master