Denied Suppressors

[Dorak]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Remove DMG reduction to suppressors.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): 1.)It will be more fun to use them.
2.)More options to add to the gun that are not useless.
3.)Some people would like to be stealthy and not make an insane amount of sound in a area.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion: None Negatives everything is positive the suppressors shouldn't even be reducing DMG in the first place.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted: I think suppressors should be reworked at least changed so its a fun attachment to use and not a attachment to avoid they could be used to have some recoil control but NOT reduce DMG on the gun.​

 

[Man of Culture]

when did this server become r6

 

[Dorak]

when did this server become r6

We can make it today VOTE now

 

[Astolfo]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi @Dorak , Your suggestion has been denied.

The supressor have a damage reduction so they don't become too good, for example, by adding a L4 supressor to your gun you get a lot of noise reduction and a 15% in bullet spread, at the cost of 20% of your gun's damage. By having this damage reduction it allows people to choose between loud and normal damage, or silent with reduced damage, which if there was no damage reduction, everyone would just run around with the same supressor.​