Denied Te-5 destruction

[Sule Goodman]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
- Allow Te-5s (once on the ground, dropped) to be destroyed via gunfire. Familiarly with keycards.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not that i've seen

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
- Logical (unless that little box is somehow bullet proof)
- Gives SCPs a slight buff (035 could shoot Te-5s dropped on the ground by combative to help RC 079 for example)

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- As stated before, could be a buff some view too much for SCPs

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Personally, I think this simply levels the playing field for 079 rc. As SCPs can clear out a group trying to hack him back in, just for there to be more te-5s on the ground and kinda throws off the playing field. Some roles do already spawn with Te-5s (E-11 Containment spec) so i don't believe this is too unbalanced.

 

[Emilia Foddg]

+Support
You couldn't destroy them already?

 

[Sule Goodman]

+Support
You couldn't destroy them already?

i recall seeing an 035 shooting one for nothing to happen , so nawh

 

[Advil Smith]

Most items can’t be destroyed why specifically TE-5? I know other items get dropped a lot like scrambles but they still are not breakable

 

[Sule Goodman]

Most items can’t be destroyed why specifically TE-5? I know other items get dropped a lot like scrambles but they still are not breakable

I would argue NVG / SCRAMBLE wouldn’t really… have a point? The moment the c4 is called everyone has them and it doesn’t drop on death. Unlike the Te5 which arguably destroying a stash of them really sets someone back

 

["BloodShed"]

-Support

SCP Buff

 

[Zack Baker]

+support
never knew this.

 

[SynergyJohn]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi @Sule Goodman,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reason(s):

Due to being able to already delete extra hacking devices by simply picking them up when you already possess them, and being able to strip them, we feel that this is unneeded at this time for the use cases provided.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​