[UK] Corr/Adrian's SA Application

[Corr "Perseus" Vynd]

Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:87833120
​

---

Discord name:
finalvigil
​

---

For how long have you played on CG SCP:
419 hours, here is my VTime ; overall I've started 2+ months ago back in November.​

---

Age:
18
​

---

In what country are you located?:
Poland
​

---

Time zone:
CET/CEST (depending on season!)
​

---

Character name(s):

Foundation:
(DEAD) - Corr "Perseus" Vynd
(Current) - Adrian "Icarus" Reacher

UNGOC:
(Current) Crane "Hades"

Civilian name:
Corr Hutcherson
​

---

What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA):
SCP-RP UK
​

---

Do you have a mic?:
Of course. HyperX Quadcast.
​

---

List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
Site Affairs:
- DEA Agent [HOLDING]
- IA Agent [HOLDING]

Mobile Task Forces:
- MTF Nu-7 LCPL (GA-O) [HELD]
- MTF E-11 SGT (DS) [HOLDING]

CL4:
- GSD Captain (HU-O) [HELD]
- Overseer Assistant [HOLDING]

External Groups:
- CI Alpha [HELD]
- UNGOC LCPL (656) [HOLDING]
​

---

Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:
1x FailRP - Dec. 3rd - Slight minging on US server - EXPIRED​

---

Why are you applying for Site Advisor?
I have been Overseer Assistant for over a month now, Site Administration feels like the natural step forward. I have high ambitions regarding the server and want to eventually make it up all the way to the O5 Council, although even besides that I want to rise up in RP ranks and further commit myself to the server and the experiences it offers.​

---

What makes you suitable for Site Administration?:
I have experience with the server as MTF, GOC and CL4. I feel like after almost 420 hours I'm competent enough to fill the shoes and role of a Site Advisor. It's the natural step in my evolution as a player and the character I represent. I've made, lead and participated in RP uncountable amounts of times, I have 102 appraisals as E-11, being the 2nd person to break that record in our reg. I believe I am dedicated, and can prove my worth. I know very well how the Site works including FLC, CoE, CoC, policies, QRF, and more. As Staff I also understand the rules and different clarifications regarding them. I constantly work to better myself, and I am open to feedback, while also being able to admit my flaws and concede when I am in the wrong.​

---

What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?:

I. Watch over Site-65 and ensure it's health.
II. Ensure the Site's different departments and individual bodies are performing their duty.
III. Coordinate with Department Leads and other CL4 about respective internal issues or policies.
IV. Authorizing AA/QRF/Mass Term when necessary.
V. Handling MC&D/UN permits for facility entry
VI. Coordinate with SC and your seniors about the Site's future
VII. Answering questions to those who seek them, being a welcoming individual to help Foundation staff in need.
VIII. Being professional, warm, and an example to others in the Foundation.
IX. Carrying out orders from above when asked to do so.
​

---

Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:
Click Here~!​

 

['Vendetta']

+Support

Perseus has done an incredible job as an OSA via displaying his creative skills, would love to see what he does with the position.

 

[Emilia Foddg]

+Support

• good at what they do, dedicated, hardworking, ambitious
• CL4 experience
• have only had positive interactions with this individual
• very active

however,

• doesn't know when to take a break

ironically, my biggest perceived downside is that you cook a little too hard. it's okay to take a break every now and then, my man. i mean yeah, you're currently on ROA in E-11 which is fine, but just make sure you don't burn yourself out, at the rate you contribute to everything. all good things in moderation

 

[Jackie3]

+support!!
-CL4 experience
-Active
- friendly and engaging in rp
- hardworking

let him cook!!!

 

[Cheetah]

+support
-Insane knowledge about everything
-friendly and knows how to keep an RP scenario going
-Did great as an OSA

LET HIM COOK

 

[Biscuits]

-Support
Recently FailRPed and lost his temper over incredibly minor inconvieniences, attempting to get me banned over tranqing someone through a door accidentally due to said temper and I had to get SL involved over it. Also had me banned from GSD for multiple days which had to get appealed by an EC member.

Though I'm unsure of your efforts as an Overseer Assistant (and other roles you hold), your behaviour in our first interaction makes me believe you're unfit for this role at the moment.

Also, your vtime is shown via using the vtime_menu command or via /vtime in chat. The screenshot you have put shows your playtime on the server, not your vtime.

 

[Glazzing]

-support
I hate the font used on the lore

 

[Corr "Perseus" Vynd]

-Support
Recently FailRPed and lost his temper over incredibly minor inconvieniences, attempting to get me banned over tranqing someone through a door accidentally and I had to get SL involved over it. Also had me banned from GSD for multiple days which had to get appealed by an EC member.

Though I'm unsure of your efforts as an Overseer Assistant (and other roles you hold), your behaviour in our first interaction makes me believe you're unfit for this role at the moment.

Do not try to paint me as a devil in that situation, because that's all your comment attempts to do without attempting to acknowledge anything on your part that contributed to it.

You tranquilized 8 people in the span of less than 10 minutes, including E-11 with which I was in TeamSpeak at the time while we're trying to RC 912, also trying to boss around people in D-Block as an SRU (believe it or not, it wasn't just E-11 but other jobs in general, and E-11 presence at the time made sense especially since we just pulled 912 out of D-Block and C5 was barely over). One of the people you tranquilized was a D-Class, and you tranquilized him through the Research Line glass door, just so you know, you aren't the only person to be threatened with a ban over this as we consider it Minor Glitching and people have been banned for 1d for it before, example: https://www.civilgamers.com/community/threads/literal-rulebreaking-traps.21681/

You also admitted to minging around at the time, and entirely went past the fact that I was *not* the one to make the choice on how long your GSD ban would be, only relaying it to a Captain and saying that I want to remove your RRT license and if I have his blessing or not (Cheetah is the one that got you job banned mind you!). With your admission to minging you were intentionally trying to provoke people into giving you a reaction, and when it came to the staff room, I instantly called over Cheetah (you also requested this, but as Cheetah has stated I called him before you did so), and chose to not involve myself in the matter of punishment or decision making whatsoever, your judgment on me being wholly based off my reaction to you quite literally, self-admittedly minging is pathetic. This situation was also handled by SL and I admitted to me getting mad.

The FailRP case against me was because you were called over to the CoS office, when me, the Captain and another OSA wanted to restrain you to RP out your job ban. You whipped out a riot shield, starting running away constantly, and going from lecture hall all the way to CS because we had enough. In addition to that, one of my fellow E-11 NCOs sent me a clip of you shooting through the Research Line door, which HAS to be investigated, mind you, SL explicitly told us staff to investigate every scenario where this occurred. And with you having Level 200+ and seeing you before in the community, on top of seemingly minging around on SRU, I had every reason to believe that this was intentional, of course you chose not to de-escalate the situation at every step, because how could you ever admit you yourself were wrong when an SL member was telling you to calm down every 5 seconds in our call, only to lambast me of losing temper?

You also managed to break FearRP here: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1Q4klCd_ha6fAf/d1337eWy5ljl?invite=cr-MSxXWmksMjEwMTcwNzQwLA (4 guns pointed at you, yet you still ended up getting into a firefight, crazy what your bias does to you!)

 

[Biscuits]

You also managed to break FearRP here: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/1Q4klCd_ha6fAf/d1337eWy5ljl?invite=cr-MSxXWmksMjEwMTcwNzQwLA (4 guns pointed at you, yet you still ended up getting into a firefight, crazy what your bias does to you!)

One gun pointed at me, Ambassador decided to shoot me while I was waiting to be cuffed.
I only open fired on the E-11 PVT as he attempted to cuff me without saying anything while trespassing (The E-11 refused to state his business within D-Block to me, which is a requirement for him to stay in the area. He wouldn't have been tranqed if he simply stated 'containment efforts'). All this clip shows is your friends attempting to entrap me over anger from a previous life. I had complete reasoning to tranq the E-11.

Do not try to paint me as a devil in that situation, because that's all your comment attempts to do without attempting to acknowledge anything on your part that contributed to it.

Wasn't, was simply stating my opinions on you for the application.

You tranquilized 8 people in the span of less than 10 minutes, including E-11 with which I was in TeamSpeak at the time while we're trying to RC 912, also trying to boss around people in D-Block as an SRU (believe it or not, it wasn't just E-11 but other jobs in general, and E-11 presence at the time made sense especially since we just pulled 912 out of D-Block and C5 was barely over). One of the people you tranquilized was a D-Class, and you tranquilized him through the Research Line glass door, just so you know, you aren't the only person to be threatened with a ban over this as we consider it Minor Glitching and people have been banned for 1d for it before, example: https://www.civilgamers.com/community/threads/literal-rulebreaking-traps.21681/

I tranqed people for one life. I then proceeded to tranq an E-11 for refusing to leave D-Block after he refused to state his business there. I am infact allowed to boss certain individuals about within the D-Block area as per policy. I had no knowledge IC and OOCly for E-11's presence within D-Block. I had zero clue at the time that you could shoot people through doors as I had just returned a few days prior.

You also admitted to minging around at the time, and entirely went past the fact that I was *not* the one to make the choice on how long your GSD ban would be, only relaying it to a Captain and saying that I want to remove your RRT license and if I have his blessing or not (Cheetah is the one that got you job banned mind you!). With your admission to minging you were intentionally trying to provoke people into giving you a reaction, and when it came to the staff room, I instantly called over Cheetah (you also requested this, but as Cheetah has stated I called him before you did so), and chose to not involve myself in the matter of punishment or decision making whatsoever, your judgment on me being wholly based off my reaction to you quite literally, self-admittedly minging is pathetic. This situation was also handled by SL and I admitted to me getting mad.

You calling me pathetic for voicing my opinion on you really shows your maturity mate. I was 'minging' for one life, afterwards I was playing normally. I did not know you didnt choose my ban time (Mb on that), I'm unsure of the validity of your claims of asking Cheetah to come over before hand though logs probably prove it. You were involving yourself by commenting on that I should be recieving a ban.

The FailRP case against me was because you were called over to the CoS office, when me, the Captain and another OSA wanted to restrain you to RP out your job ban. You whipped out a riot shield, starting running away constantly, and going from lecture hall all the way to CS because we had enough. In addition to that, one of my fellow E-11 NCOs sent me a clip of you shooting through the Research Line door, which HAS to be investigated, mind you, SL explicitly told us staff to investigate every scenario where this occurred. And with you having Level 200+ and seeing you before in the community, on top of seemingly minging around on SRU, I had every reason to believe that this was intentional, of course you chose not to de-escalate the situation at every step, because how could you ever admit you yourself were wrong when an SL member was telling you to calm down every 5 seconds in our call, only to lambast me of losing temper?

Once again, I did not know of anything relating to this bug, you expected me to know a bug which isn't clearly stated exists. Obviously, I'm allowed to state my opinions on the matter to the SL member involved, I apologise for being a bit too talkative regarding the situation. I was completely calm in the situation but wanted to voice my opinion on the matter as previously I had only been typing - where I prefer to not say that much.

All this shows is that you're incredibly rude to people for voicing their opinions on you, instead of calmly approaching the situation you choose to call me pathetic and try make me look like a shit player. Obviously I did indeed mess about for one life. The only rule I actually broke would be the 'Minor Glitching' you wanted me banned for, despite having no knowledge of such a bug existing.

I suggest familiarizing yourself with the Zone Jurisdiction Policy set in place by Site Administration, specifically the General Security Department section of it. I'm allowed to boss people around within D-Block.

 

[Skittles]

-Support

The attitude you have shown towards someone giving you a -support is quite poor, not something I would like to see in a prospective site advisor. Along with not understanding the ZJP that Biscuits attached, which has been a thing for quite a while in the UK Site 65 and in my experience has been commonly used and referred to in E-11 and general RP.

 

[Cary “Raven”]

---

The following message is composed via consensus of Site Administration .

Hello, @Corr "Perseus" Vynd . Thank you for showing an interest in expanding your duties within the Foundation.

After careful consideration, we have come to a verdict regarding this personnel role reassignment request. This request is to be denied. No further steps are required.

You may re-apply in two weeks' time.

Secure. Contain. Protect.

---

CONFIDENTIAL
This document may not be shared with or used by personnel below the designated clearance level.​