(UK) Darren Laurens executive researcher application

Status
Not open for further replies.

Darren

Well-known Member
Jul 14, 2022
1,276
187
41
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:536990847 Steam ID 3 [U:1:1073981694] Steam ID 64 76561199034247422

Discord name:
!!darren Maurader#2724

For how long have you been playing on CG-SCP:
Since march 1st i have 1.7 million seconds in playtime

Age:
14

In what country are you located?:
Ireland

Time zone:
Gmt

Character name(s):
Darren Marauder Laurens Darren tate Laurens Darren Laurens

Civilian name:
Darren tate Laurens

What server are you applying for?:
SCPRP-UK

Do you have a mic?:
Yes.

List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
Mtf e-11 Held

Ci-Beta Holding was blacklisted but i just got unblacklisted for good behaviour and me being more mature and im a ci again

scp-096 Holding

Have you received any kicks/bans/warnings? and why?:Yes unforunatly a i have alot to if i had to guess i would say around 15-20 warnings but i believe i have changed my most recent punishment was on the usa server which i believe was completely unfair it was nitrp basically as a dclass i escaped the facility 4 times in a row because people were incompatant when i escaped i would do things like close blast doors go to floor 3 and turn off the site wide lights i escaped holding multiple researchers hostage and started info breaching on open comms until some ci for no reason killed me i then was brought to an admin sit and i explained and the admins said i would be getting NITRP for adding no roleplay to my escapes or info breaches when i explained its mtfs fault a dclass managed to get a level 5 card and go into the ethics room they said it did not matter i added no roleplay and thus i was banned.I have a lot of other warns i could mention them all but its extremely long. I will go into further detail to anyone who asks but i have recieved a lot of warnings and a few bans do believe i have changed since then i hope everyone else sees that too.

Why are you applying for Executive Researcher?

I love the research department its one of the few departments i actual enjoy and want to play i am extremely active and determined.

being an executive just makes everything i love about the research department easier to achieve i love doing lectures i could make some mandatory lectures to get researchers on the know on things they should know ive seen researchers order gensec to kill dclass when researchers do not have that authority.

i love doing tests not only that i will be able to share my information with newer researchers which i actually enjoy doing not only that its the first department i have ever joined and been active cause i love to discover how different scps are coded and how they function like the fact that a 008 instance in 914 on very fine produces a regular human all of these no one had the answers to and i have tons of ideas for new tests im currently planning a 035/682 crosstest which im excited to start on and do i also have so many possible crosstest ideas i would love to do but being a normal bio researcher holds me back.

not only that when no executives are on and im on i wish i could help that jr researchers asking for someone to grade his test or the researcher asking approval for his 999/049 crosstest and all of those i wish i could help with but im unable to being an executive will make everything i love about the department easier and better to accomplish i understand some people do not trust me but im doing my best to show them that i can infact be trusted with a cl4 job and that i actual want to rp and have fun and not just minge

What makes you suitable for Executive Researcher?:

Researcher
During my time as a normal foundation researcher i learned how to many things i started off not knowing how to write a document cl2 researcher i usually just sat down for 3 minutes wrote something then did my test i kept going like this until alec bennett who was an executive researcher at the time said ''How do you find this acceptable? there is no format and you're spelling is horrible".

after this i was given a excellent graded test on scp-099 and was told to read the formatting and after this i spent an hour on a document on scp-035 and it got a good grade after getting graded i was happy as my documents started looking good and i was able to consistantly produce good and average graded tests
Senior Researcher
My time as a senior researcher was my most important as during this time i got exceptionally good at writing documents being able to produce excellent documents consistantly and i started doing cl4 tests during this time my leadership qualities improved due to me being a sergeant for gensec and me hosting lectures as a senior researcher.

during this time i did many 1 to 1 trainings which helped many jr researchers writing their first documents i also did many cl4 tests such as scp-682 which was a personnel favourite of mine on which i did an interview with scp-682 and my test was also graded excellent .

I learned how to lead researchers and do lectures efficiently and with a purpose i also gained a new appreciation for the research department furthering my interest in being a researcher in the research department.
Biohazard Researcher
During my time as a biohazard researcher my document writing skills increased by tenfold i also became exceptionally good at writing 10+ page documents with ease being able to easily write a document graded excellent fairly quickly.

In this time i also tested scp-008 which put my document writing skills and creative writing skills to the maximum i spent several days writing that scp-008 test and i believe it greatly improved me as not only did i learn and was expected to reach high standards for my documents and i was under intense scrutiny which greatly improved my document standards.
I
also learned how to be an effective superior/teacher training many jr researchers and helping them write documents i also did many lectures including how to write excellent documents for beginners in which even after the lecture i was helping the jr researchers and i helped one get an excellent document which i was extremely happy for i aspired to be someone the research department looked up to rather than down and to be a superior they could trust at one point due to my negligence my document was stolen by a tech expert which was reported to ethics i then turned myself in to ia wishing to lead in example and set a good role model to always keep yourself to a high standard

How many excellent-graded documents have you written? What makes a document excellent?

I have written 11 excellent graded documents those being research tests
What makes a document excellent is a number of factors which i will explain from the beginning to end first of all introduction the introduction is the hook that is needed to get the viewer interested ie. an interesting test idea a very good explanation of the test and a description of the scp being tested on the introduction must also feature exceptional spelling and formatting with dots and paragraphs to make the document easier to read and looking more professional also a few images is highly recommended as it makes you're document stand out from others by alot.

Next is index a good index is crucial on making you're document looking really professional and easy to read for the viewer if the viewer only wants to read the test results or conclusion the index will show them which page it is on and how long it is and makes you're document easier to read and more professional.

Next aims the aims is easily the core of you're document you are writing the aims must be clear concise and make sense in rp no reason to do a scp-035 on human subject test as that is already known example of a good aim of a test would be Scp-035 is the human brain dormant inside. or scp-008 how does the complex prion develop the aim is the core of the document as such it must be exceptionally good to be graded excellent.

Methods the methods of you're test is how you are going to conduct the test example scp-035 interview it would go ''I collected 1 dclass from dblock and 1 gensec after making my way to the heavy containment zone checkpoint i showed my id and my gensec was swapped with a mtf e-11 we then proceeded to the testing chamber and instructed the class d on what to do the airlock was opened and the dclass was entered and put on the mask'' this is an example of a methods although if you are doing a crosstest or a 008 test you're methods must be very detailed and multi page long of security protocols and incase if something goes wrong the methods are crucial in how you are going to do you're test.

Onto the test this is self exlpanatory basically what happened in you're test this should be extremely detailed on what happened since you got the dclass and end when testing is finished

Results the results to you're test are sometimes there example on my scp-008 test how does the complex prion develop the results were what i discovered in the test scp-008s complex prion can only develop if _____ meets _____ in the right conditions and of a certain humidity this is just an example of a results page its used for some tests not for all.

Conclusion the conclusion is the end to you're test/document this is whether you got the results you wanted or whether the test completely backfired if you're doing an interview you're test must include the results whether the scp is willing to cooperate with foundation staff or whether the scp in question is a sociopath or a straight up mass murderer like scp-682 the conclusion must be good as it is the end of you're test

A note a unique test idea is not required for a excellent graded test although it is greatly preferred but good spelling and formatting is way more important than a good test idea

What are the responsibilities of the Executive Researcher in RP?:

Grading documents is one of the executive researchers most important duties as if there is no executive researchers on the research department slows to a halt as no tests are being graded which means researchers are waiting and no tests area happening executive researchers also must conduct trainings to train new researchers in the department whether this be through lectures or 1 to 1 trainings the trainings can be about multiple things whether it be about document gradings how to increase you're document gradings by increasing quality code of ethics for tests or introducing new players into the research department executive researchers can also give approval for Safe>Safe
Safe>euclid crosstests between different scps executive researchers must also lead by example by being someone lower level researchers can look up to and aspire to be they may also ban researchers from the research department with a valid reason whether this be abuse of an scp 914 to upgrade their keycard running into floor 3 to leak documents what they may be job banned for a certain amount of time depending on the severity of what they did wrong.

Please give some lore about your Executive Researcher character and what storylines they would be involved in:

Darren Laurens was born in ireland year of 19██ in the town of ██████ in a small irish village after spending nearly 16 years in this small remote village he wanted to leave as he did not fit in with the rest of the people who lived there as he was interested in science not in robbing cars and robbing houses after a few failed job applications that went no where darren was stuck he had nowhere to go in life in darrens small apartment he pondered what he should do to turn his life around after meeting up with an old friend named █████ darren decided to join their gang darrens capacity for science made him an invaluable asset planning raids and evading garda that were after them and making makeshift grenades for to use darren also constructed some firearms to use in combat as smuggling in some fire arms from outside the country would be difficult darrens capacity for quick thinking and fast robberys and the making of guns lead a unit of Fbi that joined into the taskforce to conclude that a the weapons that this ''gang'' were getting their ands on were too advanced for street thugs to get their hands on and concluded that they are getting their weapons from a terrorist organasation.

The fbi cranked up their investigation into finding darren and his gang many attempts of getting a mole among them were failed as darren had security measures that only the people he trusted the most knew the full details of Darren laurens after successfully stealing from a garda station and stealing valuable intel and private files to sell on the black market was then approached by a mysterious buyer █████ ''So Darren laurens is you're name am i correct'' Darren laurens ''yes it is who what is you're job you want me to do?'' █████ '' I want you to break into site ██ its located at this address i want you to break into a secure researchers office and steal confidential files and information are you up to the task?'' Darren laurens ''Yes i am for a price what is you're offer?'' █████ '' 500 Thousand euros that is my price do you accept?'' Darren laurens'' Yes of course That is alot of the money i will start preparing immediatly'' █████ '' Wait before you go █████ *Hands darren a clearence level 3 keycard* here you will need this''.

Darren broke into site ██ by way of using a thermite charges and breaking through multiple airlocks after learning the guards routines darren then sneaked his way into the research halls after stealing a researchers uniform and disguise darren made his way to an executive researchers office and accessed the computer unfortunatly at that the time the researcher forgot to pick up his food at the office and the when he went to go collect it caught darren in the act isd who were nearby immediatly apprehended darren before he could escape and blindfolded him and brought him to a dark room ''Well hello let me guess you are apart of the chaos insurgency am i correct in that assumption?"' Darren replied '' What the hell is the chaos insurgency?'' '' Hey you do not play dumb with us or we will be forced to extract answers from you which we do not want to do' i sugest you cooperate with us'' The mysterious man left the room with a glock p80 loaded left on the table *Darren picked up the gun and briefly thought of killing himself but was not able to go through with it the gun was loaded with 1 bullet after the men entered the room again darren pointed a gun at them ''DONT YOU ARE GET CLOSE TO ME YOU WONT TAKE ME ALIVE'' *darren pointing a gun to his head* for a moment darren was going to hit the trigger but found himself unable to take his own life The men wearing body armor replied with '' You most certainly are not the chaos insurgency a chaos insurgency operative would of taken his own life by now but you didnt who are you?" .

After what happened in the interrogation room darren was offered a job in the scp foundation darren wanting to fulfil his dream asked to be a junior researcher darren was handed a keycard and was told to sign a bunch of papers and documents and was told to not say a word about the foundation to anyone outside the scp foundation darren was handed a cl1 and was introduced to his first anomaly darren rised through the ranks extremely quickly attending lectures and chatting with experienced researchers on how to improve formatting and different test ideas darren rose through the ranks of the research department extremely quickly becoming a full researcher in less than a year darren when he became a keycard level 2 researcher was over the moon being granted to so much information that he previously never knew and was granted access to test on cl3 scps if escorted by a researcher if escorted by a researcher with the level3+ clearence darren after making a breakthrough discover on scp-035 was promoted to senior researcher once darren became a senior researcher after a few years of tests that dramatically reduced foundation deaths and breaches of the scps that darren studied after making a breakthrough discovery on scp-███ discovering how it developed in the wild and preventing possible infections of it and preventing and saving thousands of lives by allowing the foundation to stop potential areas where scp-███ could develop in the wild darren after this breakthrough discovery was highly motivated and deicided it was time to rise through the ranks once more time
 
Last edited:

Millzy

Well-known Member
Donator
Mar 28, 2022
199
55
41

+/- Neutral


+ Good Application with sufficient detail provided.


+ Decent understanding of excellent documents

+ Large improvement

+/- Rough first impression

- A lot of bans/warns


- Can be immature at times but is improving

- Little to no grammar and punctuation skills

Best of luck, Darren.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darren
Jun 19, 2022
159
58
111
+Support
  • Improved attitude
  • Good app. Understands exec. nice lore etc.
  • Active as ScD.

Hi Darren. I've seen major improvement on your part within the server when it comes to making a good impression via attitude and perception. I've also seen you active as a researcher and you've even attended ScD meetings. Because of all this and your clear commitment to the Science Department, I will happily give you a +Support this time. I genuinely believe you are ready for the position this time despite the rocky past. Best of luck.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Darren

Bailey

Well-known Member
Jul 19, 2022
69
18
41
=Neutral Support

+Nice looking application
+Understands what is needed for an excellent document

=An average amount of interactions, so I cannot comment completely on maturity or behaviour
-15-20 warnings makes me feel very sceptical about how you will act as an executive


Hello Darren, I will be leaving a =Neutral Support, you do have experience in the research department which is amazing to see however, I cannot comment on behaviour or maturity due to not having enough interactions with you and having a large amount of warnings as you do, doesn't necessarily leave a good impression on me unfortunately, Best of luck Darren
 

Agatha

Active member
Jul 25, 2022
18
9
21
HK
Neutral
From personal experience, Darren has improved a lot in both RP and behaviour. However, he can be quite annoying at times (Learn to wait a bit for stuff, Darren, don't just spam comms like 500 messages per minute to request a Ethics member or whatnot, it does come off as attention seeking bit too much) and that definitely needs to be improved.

Honestly, Darren's application is better than most of the recent ones that were accepted, I can see much more effort in this than those people's (not trying to throw shades here, but I can't help it), so good job on that as well.

Of course, people will obviously point to Darren's track record, and to that, I say, people can change. So if Darren does keep improving, why not give him this one?

Though, for real, Darren you need to learn a bit more about punctuations, a giant chunk of text is not a good look on anything. And this is where I do sort of have doubts in your capacity to properly rate documents.

Also, Darren's professionalism IS questionable, and he has had both research bans and research warnings before (Albeit only one per each).


But hey, if he fucks up again, the role can be gone as quickly as he gets it, so if Darren steps out of line, it certainly won't end well for him.
 
Last edited:

SS3920

Active member
Aug 11, 2022
35
21
21
+ Support
- Mature
- Active
- A good person
- Good Lectures
- Articulate

- You do have warnings, but from what ive read from others, your behaviour has improved :)
I really think Darren should be given atleast a chance to be an Exec. From the interactions ive had with him he is clearly passionate about research and the department itself. He is a rolemodel for any of the other researchers onsite in the sense that he takes his research seriously.

Good Luck Darren :)
 
  • Love
Reactions: Darren
- Support

- Incident that happened today with Epsilon-11:

Bad Documentation for a test - Then you got arsy at our E-11 LTCOM Luka because E-11 didn't want to conduct the test because of the bad documentation.

- Because this incident was today, I don't believe you've changed

- Furthermore, your previous behaviours and warnings are still recent. I still remember an incident (I don't remember what exactly it was) which was around a week ago which you had done which was not good.


Although your improvement in behaviour is amazing, I just had this incident reported in Epsilon-11 today by my LTCOM and all other members of Epsilon-11 invovled in that incident.
Becuase of how recent this event was, I can't in good faith put an opinion other than -support at this time. Sorry Darren
 
Hey Darren, I'm leaving you ? a -Support and here is why:


- You have shown rude behaviour towards an MTF E-11 LTCOM today.
- The document you presented towards E-11 was scruffy and had a lack of detail
- Questionable Actions in the past within the Community
- I haven't seen much things from you to show me you have changed.


Best of Luck However,
"Hyland"

?
 

Darren

Well-known Member
Jul 14, 2022
1,276
187
41
- Support

- Incident that happened today with Epsilon-11:

Bad Documentation for a test - Then you got arsy at our E-11 LTCOM Luka because E-11 didn't want to conduct the test because of the bad documentation.

- Because this incident was today, I don't believe you've changed

- Furthermore, your previous behaviours and warnings are still recent. I still remember an incident (I don't remember what exactly it was) which was around a week ago which you had done which was not good.


Although your improvement in behaviour is amazing, I just had this incident reported in Epsilon-11 today by my LTCOM and all other members of Epsilon-11 invovled in that incident.
Becuase of how recent this event was, I can't in good faith put an opinion other than -support at this time. Sorry Darren
Yes but i was not simply ''Rude'' i was confused i went to site command with a keter keter crosstest it was approved i then informed the highest ranking e-11 currently of the tests approval and conduction the e-11 did not like and went off i left it at that when i talking to some execs about i said how frustrating some e-11 are to work with unfortunatly at that time a e-11 litenaunt was eaves dropping in on my conversation and said not to talk behind our backs i said im not talking behind you're back as i am not talking to you that was the entire incident no more no less just a miscommunication between departments i believe i should leave my input here as it simply was not me getting angry at a e-11 for no good reason.

I also believe that luka should be talked to regarding on how to not insult someone as all i remember from showing luka the document was constant insulting of me saying those site command dumbasses who approved this test. that is what luka said when showed the document although i do not care that much about luka not liking the document i believe luka should be talked about cause of this neither of us were technically in the wrong.

I also recommend to tell you're e-11 not to eaves drop on conversations that they are not involved in.

Also i was not talking about e-11 and how mad i was about them refusing my test i was talking about how immature the e-11 seem to be as it is full with people who do false reports 24/7 which i have plenty of accounts of i was talking about how some e-11 can be mind numbingly hard to work with there are people in e-11 to refer to themselves as minges themselves although i will not name they make up the large majority.

Also not to mention one e-11 does not have the authority to deny a test that site command approved not even the dor has that authority luka is lucky enough i did not get luka demoted from e-11 commander for refusing the order of site command which is the highest authority.

(EDIT) a site advisor reached over to me in discord and informed me that i am in the right and e-11 are comepletely wrong and that it will affect their department review

Hey Darren, I'm leaving you ? a -Support and here is why:


- You have shown rude behaviour towards an MTF E-11 LTCOM today.
- The document you presented towards E-11 was scruffy and had a lack of detail
- Questionable Actions in the past within the Community
- I haven't seen much things from you to show me you have changed.

This is actually completely false and i am in the right case closed proof@Smug - Discord 08_10_2022 18_06_10 (2).png
Now e-11 and the dor told me that e-11 have the permssion to deny my cross test but turns out this is completely false as you can see from this site advisor since my test was approved by site command themselves the e-11 have no right and authority to deny my test infact if i am correct not even the director of research has the authority to stop my test since it is from site command themselves and this is being brought up in e-11 department review i also was not disrespectful i believe if i really wanted to i could of forwarded this to site command and severe reprecussions could of been faced to that e-11 for denying my test and refusing i was not aware of this but due to this information i was in the right and you and appos -supports are completely invalid due to me being in the right not only that you're e-11 commander showed a severe lack of care towards the chain of command and a direct order from the O5 council due to me being actually for once being in the right with all the cl4 holders and department directors being in the wrong never thought i would say that turns out i was actually in the right the whole time and you and you're e-11 that refused my test could face a department review also im not a person to take things personally but please do not try to say im ''Immature'' ''Rude'' to me when i was in the right and you're commanders where wrong i also feel let down by the e-11 involved i assumed due to them being senior cl4 holders they were in the right @Smug - Discord 08_10_2022 18_15_08 (2).png
i do not wish for this to harm future involvments we have but i believe you should of been more professional and respectful to me since not only did you e-11 insult me i also felt bad cause i believed that i was doing something wrong and i actually feel sad that people who i once trusted are abusing the rules and reporting me to the director of research when legit did nothing wrong. Not only that disappointment in knowing i was let down by people who outranked me and i trusted. also e-11 do not have the right to not conduct a test that was approved by site command




Also otters im sorry for going through with the test but it was approved by another site command and not you since it was approved me waiting for you to get on was not really an option cause that was our original agreement that i was gonna wait for you to get on and if appropriate number of e-11 were on i would be granted approval
 
Last edited:

Darren

Well-known Member
Jul 14, 2022
1,276
187
41
Changing to -Support
Today has been a massive minge after the implementation of Mayor job, kept trying to assassinate him without RP reasons
rp reason what there was literally a revolt going on my guy the civilians were doing a rp situation where the major was being overthrown me trying to kill the major is completely in rp not only that there were admins doing the same namely erl carlson who is a mod who defected from being a ranger and gave civilians guns to kill the major if this is me minging then im sorry to say half the mod team ci and 20+ civilians need to be warned/striked for failrp.

Also come on bro literally how did you not notice the fact that pinewood had literally attempted a coup de tat on the major me trying to kill him was in rp not only that there were moderators doing the same.

Also enzo you literally tried to ruin the fun and rp you with a straight face tried to stop an rp situation and multiple people disagreed with you for the first time civilian surface rp was fun and civilians were rping and having fun even the major himself loved it saying he is happy for the surface to have actual rp and that he enjoyed it you tried to ruin it by saying fAiL rP fAiL rP and literally tried to stop it not only that many admins stepped in to stop you from ruining an active rp situation.

Literally a mod named erl carlson was participating in the revolt and somehow out of 20+ people im in the wrong and im the minge bro half atleast 1/5 of the server was in pinewood doing the exact same if im commiting failrp then you have to warn about 1/5th of the server and have multiple admins removed from their jobs you were the only person in the server who did not enjoy overthrowing the major. the fact that 1/5th of the server participated is evidence enough that it was not failrp
 
Last edited:

Darren

Well-known Member
Jul 14, 2022
1,276
187
41
Actually called a sit and a Senior Admin told you to stop but you ignored him, find it kinda immature from your side as fun doesn't mean Team Deathmatch
when a admin never told me to stop the only admin that actually came to me during the revolt was a admin that i called a sit for the goc hid the major to keep him safe i obtained a level 3 goc card from a dead body i asked if i am allowed to enter along with other civilians to kill the major and i told this was not allowed so i simply just did nothing with the card and handed it to a goc.

I would assume a mod would be above lying but i guess i was wrong you did not call a sit on me if you did i would be suprised serious how me some logs of you calling a sit on me

+ Support
- Mature
- Active
- A good person
- Good Lectures
- Articulate
- You do have warnings, but from what ive read from others, your behaviour has improved :)
I really think Darren should be given atleast a chance to be an Exec. From the interactions ive had with him he is clearly passionate about research and the department itself. He is a rolemodel for any of the other researchers onsite in the sense that he takes his research seriously.

Good Luck Darren :)

Thank you i had fun writing that crosstest and us going to floor 3 to get approval

From personal experience, Darren has improved a lot in both RP and behaviour. However, he can be quite annoying at times (Learn to wait a bit for stuff, Darren, don't just spam comms like 500 messages per minute to request a Ethics member or whatnot, it does come off as attention seeking bit too much) and that definitely needs to be improved.

Honestly, Darren's application is better than most of the recent ones that were accepted, I can see much more effort in this than those people's (not trying to throw shades here, but I can't help it), so good job on that as well.

Of course, people will obviously point to Darren's track record, and to that, I say, people can change. So if Darren does keep improving, why not give him this one?

Though, for real, Darren you need to learn a bit more about punctuations, a giant chunk of text is not a good look on anything. And this is where I do sort of have doubts in your capacity to properly rate documents.

Also, Darren's professionalism IS questionable, and he has had both research bans and research warnings before (Albeit only one per each).

But hey, if he fucks up again, the role can be gone as quickly as he gets it, so if Darren steps out of line, it certainly won't end well for him.

Thank you for understanding im actively improving myself and avoiding situations that could lead to mingy behaviour i also think twice before doing anything i do want to improve ive studied alot about the executive researcher role and will not minge and mess up or step out of line
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 2482

Guest
+Support

Darren has shown himself to be a more mature individual. Other then that he is fully ready to be an executive due to his document work proving he has a grasp on documents. I believe he should be put on a 2 week trial period, but that's my opinion

Regarding the E11 incident, while I have not read the whole blocks of text, it still feels fucking stupid for e11 to second guess a fucking site command order. This alongside what seemed eve droping and accusing him of "talking behind their back" when he was talking in a private conversation with full right to do so. Not only does this undermine the power of site command it seemes like personal bias. Also to the peaple that complained about documentation do you really belive that site command would just aprove anything, plus I have seen Darrens documents they are great. The whole situation seems so stupid at least from the side of E11, I can completlly understand how someone could get frustrated because of that
 

MrSiens

Senior Game Master
Senior Game Master
Mar 21, 2022
267
85
71
umomwhh-png.3197

Application Denied

Hello Darren,
Thank you for taking the time to make another Executive researcher application.
I really do appreciate the fact that you are genuinely improving and trying again and i truly believe you are committed to changing for the better.

While you have improved in many areas, namely your application, your documentation and your general reputation within the department and the greater community, there are still key areas in which you are lacking which prevent me from accepting you into the Executive Team.

Key area 1.
Punctuation and grammatical skill are still sincerely lacking, including your formatting, which greatly complicates the process of understanding the things you write, the application and your responses not exempt, which would conflict greatly with the expected duties of the position.

We do not expect perfect grammatical mastery, but your current aptitute is insufficient.

Key area 2.
Conflict Resolution, maybe as part of the first making it more difficult for you to have yourself be understood by others, is still very unfortunate, while by technicality, you were in the right in the E-11 situation, largely atleast, i cannot condem the actions of the E-11 LTCOM, especially seeing how you reacted very improperly.

There will be many situations, as an executive researcher more than ever, where things will not go your way.
Whether this is because of your fault, or because you were wronged is irrelevant in how you deal with them, as often it will not be apprent in the moment which has occured to neither you nor anyone else.

Being able to correctly respond to even these situations is of utmost importance as CL4 personnel, and your actions at that moment, instead of simply contacting anyone capable of helping such as myself, to the point that the comments in this application were the first i had actually heard about it, were unbecoming and do not inspire confidence in me with how you will handle the situations a CL4 Foundation member has to deal with on the Regular.

Lastly, your responses in which you were almost gloating at some of my remarks, when i myself had yet to attain a full grasp of the situation, and using my DMs without any regard for this, nor considering asking me first before doing so also does not inspire confidence.

Please work on the second above all, Darren.

You may apply again in Two (2) Weeks.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.