Donator
Steam ID:
STEAM_0:1:33007778Discord name:
nopetoofastFor how long have you played on CG SCP:
Over 2 years, since roughly May 2023.Age:
28In what country are you located?:
UKTime zone:
GMTCharacter name(s):
F - Emilia FoddgCI - Hakada Dispensa
Civilian name:
Oh-ho 'Eightzo' M'bee-varrisWhat server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA):
UKDo you have a mic?:
Yesn'tList all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
Holding:- SCP-096 (Both servers)
- SCP-22415
- ISD/DEA WL, Medical License, Riot License
- Site Advisor Application Ban (I was banned from applying following my previous Site Advisor application, I appealed this on 16/10/24 with the then-current O5-1 at the time, who convened with the other O5 and I was told the following day that my appeal was accepted and the ban lifted)
- MTF E-11 CPT
- Overseer Assistant
- GOC SGT
- MTF Nu7 CPL
- CI Gamma
Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:
- 13th July, 2023 - FailRP for hacking out SCPs as a Sr. Researcher.
- 23rd of September, 2023 - FailRP for leaving fake 096 pics in FL3 elevator.
- 14th of February, 2024 - Manual AFK Kick.
- 11th of June, 2025 - Broke FearRP by panic-using 106 when held under gunpoint.
- 19th of November, 2025 - Engaged in unauthorised TreasonRP = FailRP
Why are you applying for Site Advisor?
I am interested in the day-to-day affairs of Site Administration and trying my best to do what Site Administration does - I feel largely the same on this particular topic as when I did when I last applied, but I've given this some more thought and have at least attempted to expand out a bit more before settling on trying for SA once again, having tried out Nu7 and while trying to get a feel for how Nu7 is, also try to get into A-1 again. Needless to say, the latter failed and the former I don't think really worked out, I don't think Nu7 is for me. As I stated in my prior application, I don't feel like further progression in ISD/DEA/Research/Medical/GenSec are for me at the time being, nor do still I feel like returning to E-11. For E-11 and Nu7, It's a mix of not being able to keep up with what's needed of me, but also a general disagreement of where the regiments are and are going right now.I retain interest in progressing to a potential FCOM position at some later point, but acknowledge that I am not ready for it at this time. After a year's worth of thought, I have decided that I would like to continue pursuing a position in Site Administration, rather than just generally putting my energy into comparatively mundane RP.
What makes you suitable for Site Administration?:
Honestly? I'm probably not. I know that I wasn't when I applied the last couple times, but now especially because I am additionally extremely rusty - All I can say is that I haven't made the reckless decision to dive into this cold turkey; I have attempted to maintain some level of activity on the server and kept an eye on general server affairs and such. The only real thing I have going for me here is that I have enough prior experience in positions to be able to make the necessary calls when it comes to evaluating a situation and developing a reasonable response for/to/in anticipation of it. It's hard to explain, but there's a specific way that you learn to think when it comes to a position of leadership, you learn to think about things in a certain way and then you never really shake that. That way of thinking sticks with you and you just naturally learn what's right and what's wrong.What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?:
First and foremost, Site Administration are overseen by FCOM. They sort of have the same kind of relationship with SA, as SA have with the departments they oversee as described later, in that they generally don't micromanage - But they will keep them in line if they are misbehaving, typically through the use of Assistants and A-1 (I forget if SA know that much about AO following the recent changes; I imagine Advisors don't, but I understand that I'll be instructed on the specifics relating to this during initiation - My intuition is that Site Advisors only know AO as Law Enforcement, but I may be wrong). Sometimes, O5/EC may discuss policy or a position appointment with SA. This isn't particularly typical and SA are generally given autonomy on the matter of Site Policy - But they may especially do so in cases following some form of major incident involving AO, either Foundation Command branch, or where a policy involves an area directly relevant to O5/EC, such as FL3/ECO, Or some kind of other relevant interest not covered here.As I understand it, the relation between SA and the rest of the department is unusual and not easily boiled down. In terms of authority, they supersede every department except Foundation Command... And sooooorta AO? That one's a reaaally weird interaction because of certain circumstances, certain specific interactions - Like for example, it'd be perfectly ordinary for a Site Advisor to march into say, E-11 bunks and order a bunch of COs and NCOs to do a bunch of things specific to some specific circumstance, like for example something to do with HCZ, maybe a lockdown for an upcoming test or some kind of policy change - But if they tried that with say, O-1, even if it was related to... Best example I could think of would be some kind of project involving Ethics? It's just really, really fuzzy. The point is, I used to understand the weird thing going on there, but I don't anymore. I imagine that state of affairs has since changed as what knowledge I did have is grossly outdated, but I presume I will be informed of the correct standing when initiated as a Site Advisor.
Anyway, my general point here is that SA don't really micromanage. I mean, when they're on the scene, they're generally exercising their authority and usually with good reason, even though yes, people in general should be typically seeing SA around the site, but for the most part it'd be unusual to see a Site Advisor randomly run into Medbay and just start telling a Sr. Doctor what to do, unless it was part of some specific RP situation or storyline.
As significant RP leadership positions, Site Administration have a huge responsibility and plethora of duties regarding the entire site, most notably its departments and regiments - As the next step up in the CoC from Department Directors (And second-highest authority on-site (...Again, yes, Assistants under direct orders are higher too - But they're basically just facilitating the will of O5/EC and employing their authority to do so, so this still makes sense in that regard)). Site Administration are responsible for managing the policies, powers, disputes and affairs of:
- Mobile Task Force Epsilon-11
- Mobile Task Force Nu-7
- Department of Medicine
- Department of Research
- Department of Internal Security
- Department of External Affairs
- General Security
- Engineering & Technical Services
- Department of Catering
- Janitorial Services
- Epsilon-11 Commander
- Nu-7 Commander
- Director of Research
- Director of Medicine
- Director of External Affairs
- Chief of Security
Site Administration are also in charge of IC policies - Whether site-wide policies such as the Departmental Jurisdiction Policy, which determines a department/regiment's local authority relative to an area, internal policies, such as the Research Policy, which determines the specific rules for RsD, or agreements between the Foundation and GOIs. In the case of agreements between the Foundation and GOIs, Site Administration are usually present at negotiations and will take part in negotiating terms with the GOI. Sometimes, Site Administration will review these policies to determine if they need revision, to reflect changes within the site or otherwise address any issues within the policy.
Additionally on the topic of agreements with GOIs, Site Administration work in tandem with the DEA, generally overseeing them to ensure that they are appropriately handling external relations - They may also interact directly with other GOIs over comms, if necessary. Generally, DEA are supposed to be the first point of contact for other GOIs, but if DEA are mishandling situations and such, it falls to Site Administration to handle such matters.
Site Administration oversee all Code Emergencies with the aim of resolving any incidents as quickly as possible. In addition to maintaining regular communication with GenSec and MTFs to both stay apprised of the situation and determine emergency response, Site Administration can also perform general CL4 duties in the event of emergency, such as operating the PW blast door, Breach Shelter and/or EOC - But most importantly, authorising Advanced Armoury, if circumstances are dire enough and the need arise. The Site Director & Manager also has the capability to call in ERT should an SCP breach become too much to handle; thus as a Site Advisor, it is important to ensure clear and prompt information flow so that the decision can be made with relative ease, should it come under consideration.
Site Administration also generally authorise tests that don't involve ethical concerns, as well as situations where parts of the site need to be locked down for a test or training and passive SCP breaches. As a CL4 role, Site Administration are expected to create RP around the site, which for them usually comes in the form of assignments or long-term projects. Projects can involve SCPs, and generally have some form of goal, which typically also involves further document creation. In all cases, the aim is generally to give people some kind of activity to perform on-site in the form of RP.
Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:
Lore Document
Last edited: