<UK> Rebecca Estrela's Ethics Member Application.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Claire! said:
@hoka only if you don’t drug me again
Click to expand...
it was NOT drugged.. you are a lightweight smh.

anyways massive +support again!

one of the most active and consistent people i've seen around! from my experience, you're always welcome people trying to larp with you while creating a good amount of your own aswell.. would be an awesome ECM
 
You are speedrunning this a bit too quick Claire.

I think in time for sure ECM but we do need to talk about the elephant in the room, you returned start of April after a very long blacklist with a staff blacklist in place for a substantial time. You have then shot up the ranks exceptionally quick which is a double edged sword for someone in your position.

Don't get me wrong, you are good at rp but you need to do less management and more story based engagement with players to set foot into a CL5 role.

It is a -Support from me for now but I think the next reasonable step in time is Site Director which I would fully support you for, along with you trying to overturn the staff blacklist as well.

Regardless, I wish you the very best of luck but I felt it important to comment on this
 
  • Like
Reactions: Claire!
Charles Ze Whitmee said:
Hey Claire, mind if I ask if you could share any recent Roleplay you created as Site Admin? You'd have higher expectations as ECM and would like to see what you can provide.


And please touch grass.
Click to expand...
Hi

Some roleplay I created was some mental breakdown roleplay I was bringing the other day to medical and F3. Which resulted in Rebecca getting a tight leash put on her and put on anti psychotics.

I’ve consistently also made an effort to make it easier to speak to site administration, with Q&As, that branch off and create other roleplay opportunities.

I also created some corrupt non corrupt roleplay the other day when I cut medical’s fun funding by 5% ICly for the fact some were misbehaving and gave it to IPD. This resulted in medical personnel charging for drugs, ISD and the ethics chairwoman getting involved, and then was later given back to medical staff because it wasn’t properly voted on ICly.

There’s also a lot of smaller rp scenarios I do, that I can expand on more if people so wish.
 
Claire! said:
The third group is unknown, but tactics are consistent with Foundation training.
Click to expand...
Heavily implied to be Resh-1. Administrator's the one that kills himself in SCP-001's cell, so Resh-1 presence is to be expected.1783693691645.png
Claire! said:
This is the 35th time, so to my knowledge, each time they have done this, they are all terminated.
Click to expand...
Each time Primary Action has been completed it ended in all of O5 dying. That's the reason they can still pull a Primary Action, because the new O5 never know about it. It's implied that there has never been an unsuccessful Primary Action, considering the new O5-1 has no idea why the previous O5's are gone:
1783694276937.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Claire!
Claire! said:
I mentioned setting up a corrupt ISD agent (hopefully working with a current member of ISD OOCly, to spread information slandering the ethics committee and the foundation legal codex, as well as taking bribes from individuals)
Click to expand...
This is just a PoI thread not exactly what I was expecting when talking about storylines. Don't get me wrong PoIs can result in good storylines, but this wouldn't be one of them.
Claire! said:
I would also like a storyline involving E-11 and Omega-1 in which they will work together to gather information about unethical acts that may go on in tests, or unethical acts that anomalous staff may be conducting.
Click to expand...
This is an evidence gathering order and from experience these never work out. The only way this will work out is if there was a group of researcher that would constantly be doing unethical testing.

If you have any other ideas, feel free to add them, but as of now I'll leave a +/- Neutral support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Claire!
|EMAIL RECEIVED|
.
.
.
|LOADING. . .|
.
.
.
|MESSAGE LOADING COMPLETE|
| CONFIDENTIAL |

| From: | Ethics Chairman Alexandria Roselle (A.Roselle@EC.scp.fn) |
| To: | Site Manager Rebecca Estrela (REstrela@site65.scp.fnd.ca) |
| Subject: | Reassignment request verdict |



Good evening miss Rebecca Estrela,

I hope this email finds you well.
I send you this email today to inform you of the verdict regarding your request for reassignment to a seat on the Ethics committee. Know that the position you have applied for is not a single step, but a large leap from your current position.
But to avoid pointless one sided conversation, your request has been respectfully

Denied.

Don’t take this as a form of discouragement, see it as more of a chance to prove me wrong in denying you this seat in the committee. There will always be another chance.
For a more in depth feedback list, please reach out to me over external communications.

“ Don’t disappoint me. “
-Ethics member Alexandria Roselle


| END OF TRANSMISSION |
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back