[UK] Reginald A. E. Pritchard's Ethics Chairman Application

+support only good roleplay interactions



CherryBones said:
-Support
Do I like you as Ethics chairman? Yea. Do I think you'd be able to actually make something good out of ethics? Yea. Unfortunately you've had certain OOC based interactions that show how abrasive and hard to work with you can be. Calling individuals 'retarded', 'delusional', ect in Discord and TeamSpeak come to mind. Like seriously, without joking calling people that are not your freinds these things in the public CN discord. Don't get it twisted, I'd like to join the army of +Supp and I was originally happy over the idea of you coming back but after thinking about it critically maybe it's best it doesn't happen. At least not right now.

And ta the fuckers that ain't putting their -supps in but will be protesting this in their own ways. Cowards. The lot of ya.
Click to expand...
as for this despite my other message being deleted, i believe this is a joke! :D
 
- Support
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

- Normally I don't place a - support and normally just don't respond to applications I - support as I feel badly later on. However, this is one of those situations where I don't believe that you will hold the position for long as of what happened with director of ISD being held for a rather short period of time. Additionally jumping straight to the Ethics chairman is a leap and a half especially since I don't think you hold a regular Cl4 role as well as recent, as well as there has been recent concerns that have been arising regarding your reputation and general interactions between other members to the community OOC, being rude which then affects morale from people. Don't get me wrong you are fit for the role however, this is not the role you should just to off the bat in my eyes, I'd suggest just going for Cl,4 for now rather than chairman.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////​
 
-support
Don't know why my reply of saying -support, with a simply stated reason of him being a minge, for stating the obvious fact that the individual, that's applied for ECC, prior to their application would often hop onto ISD with their friends and minge around, pausing and ruining RP for myself and others.
It seems to me complete and utterly unreasonable that such a person could ever be seen to be fit for lead position within the server, someone that's repeatedly had bad intentions and used their influence, to sway decisions in their favor.
I'm not commenting to take away from nor discredit others opinions nor degrading their reasonings for support this thing that's applying for ECC, but to simply share my general take from every single one of my interactions with the individual.
 
+Support

To anyone -Supporting, I'd challenge you name another person that could do this role well and actually give the Committee and Omega-1 what it needs right now

Anyone saying Remmy is difficult to work with has clearly gone to Remmy with some half assed poorly thought out RP idea and been told no or knows someone who has. In my experience as someone who never half assed something and expected people to just be forced to go along with it and then proceeded to bitch and whine about it after people didn't (like a few people and or regiments/departments who done the same boring, annoying, and sometimes vaguely edgy treason RP loop for about a year and a half over and over again) Remmy was always supportive and willing to be involved in roleplay that was being created and needed committee involvement or investigation.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back