[UK] Reginald A. E. Pritchard's Ethics Chairman Application
- Thread starter Remmy
- Start date
-Support
I've heard you have been minging and causing issues, since you held 2 sr cl5 roles you should know better.
I've heard you have been minging and causing issues, since you held 2 sr cl5 roles you should know better.
![Jessy Soul [XD-4]](/community/data/avatars/m/3/3443.jpg?1662483101){kind=avatar}
- Support
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- Normally I don't place a - support and normally just don't respond to applications I - support as I feel badly later on. However, this is one of those situations where I don't believe that you will hold the position for long as of what happened with director of ISD being held for a rather short period of time. Additionally jumping straight to the Ethics chairman is a leap and a half especially since I don't think you hold a regular Cl4 role as well as recent, as well as there has been recent concerns that have been arising regarding your reputation and general interactions between other members to the community OOC, being rude which then affects morale from people. Don't get me wrong you are fit for the role however, this is not the role you should just to off the bat in my eyes, I'd suggest just going for Cl,4 for now rather than chairman.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
- Normally I don't place a - support and normally just don't respond to applications I - support as I feel badly later on. However, this is one of those situations where I don't believe that you will hold the position for long as of what happened with director of ISD being held for a rather short period of time. Additionally jumping straight to the Ethics chairman is a leap and a half especially since I don't think you hold a regular Cl4 role as well as recent, as well as there has been recent concerns that have been arising regarding your reputation and general interactions between other members to the community OOC, being rude which then affects morale from people. Don't get me wrong you are fit for the role however, this is not the role you should just to off the bat in my eyes, I'd suggest just going for Cl,4 for now rather than chairman.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-support
Don't know why my reply of saying -support, with a simply stated reason of him being a minge, for stating the obvious fact that the individual, that's applied for ECC, prior to their application would often hop onto ISD with their friends and minge around, pausing and ruining RP for myself and others.
It seems to me complete and utterly unreasonable that such a person could ever be seen to be fit for lead position within the server, someone that's repeatedly had bad intentions and used their influence, to sway decisions in their favor.
I'm not commenting to take away from nor discredit others opinions nor degrading their reasonings for support this thing that's applying for ECC, but to simply share my general take from every single one of my interactions with the individual.
Don't know why my reply of saying -support, with a simply stated reason of him being a minge, for stating the obvious fact that the individual, that's applied for ECC, prior to their application would often hop onto ISD with their friends and minge around, pausing and ruining RP for myself and others.
It seems to me complete and utterly unreasonable that such a person could ever be seen to be fit for lead position within the server, someone that's repeatedly had bad intentions and used their influence, to sway decisions in their favor.
I'm not commenting to take away from nor discredit others opinions nor degrading their reasonings for support this thing that's applying for ECC, but to simply share my general take from every single one of my interactions with the individual.
- Support
Rude and quite toxic, tbh. Don't think someone who is that difficult to work with should be in such a position.
Rude and quite toxic, tbh. Don't think someone who is that difficult to work with should be in such a position.
+Support
To anyone -Supporting, I'd challenge you name another person that could do this role well and actually give the Committee and Omega-1 what it needs right now
Anyone saying Remmy is difficult to work with has clearly gone to Remmy with some half assed poorly thought out RP idea and been told no or knows someone who has. In my experience as someone who never half assed something and expected people to just be forced to go along with it and then proceeded to bitch and whine about it after people didn't (like a few people and or regiments/departments who done the same boring, annoying, and sometimes vaguely edgy treason RP loop for about a year and a half over and over again) Remmy was always supportive and willing to be involved in roleplay that was being created and needed committee involvement or investigation.
To anyone -Supporting, I'd challenge you name another person that could do this role well and actually give the Committee and Omega-1 what it needs right now
Anyone saying Remmy is difficult to work with has clearly gone to Remmy with some half assed poorly thought out RP idea and been told no or knows someone who has. In my experience as someone who never half assed something and expected people to just be forced to go along with it and then proceeded to bitch and whine about it after people didn't (like a few people and or regiments/departments who done the same boring, annoying, and sometimes vaguely edgy treason RP loop for about a year and a half over and over again) Remmy was always supportive and willing to be involved in roleplay that was being created and needed committee involvement or investigation.
Last edited:
Are we going to pretend you weren't directly involved in a witchhunt against an entire Committee because your friend got striked in a virtual position and had a spergout over it
-Support
Please do tell me which RP did you take from others because I would love to hear it personally.
When I was O1, you have not contributed much to anything than walking around with GM body guards and being toxic to O1 for being incompetent, you have never been in TS when walking out of ECM offices and never gave others the RP opportunity, when there was no RP involved you would immediately leave the server than actually trying to create it. When you were O5-1 you only caused problems for others because you had these ego moments, furthermore, playing with your powers at will. The A1 regiment were not happy about what you have been doing and it showed when you resigned. You alone made FCOM worse than it was and has not contributed or helped others with RP but took them for yourself which only made people want to quit and resign from the regiment. The only times you did something was going to SSL because you were not happy about something and forced them to do changes.
Please do tell me which RP did you take from others because I would love to hear it personally.
When I was O1, you have not contributed much to anything than walking around with GM body guards and being toxic to O1 for being incompetent, you have never been in TS when walking out of ECM offices and never gave others the RP opportunity, when there was no RP involved you would immediately leave the server than actually trying to create it. When you were O5-1 you only caused problems for others because you had these ego moments, furthermore, playing with your powers at will. The A1 regiment were not happy about what you have been doing and it showed when you resigned. You alone made FCOM worse than it was and has not contributed or helped others with RP but took them for yourself which only made people want to quit and resign from the regiment. The only times you did something was going to SSL because you were not happy about something and forced them to do changes.
Aren't you the one that was handed all the answers to the ECM test because your friend was the head of the EC?
If i was involved in this "witchhunt" i would've been removed from Omega-1 seeing as it was couped. If I recall, the group mentality had skipped me for promotion and someone else was chosen due to the fact I was friends with the previous 2 commanders.
Funny how you are throwing a tantrum over your friend's APP, afterall it wouldn't surprise me if you suddenly were to put in a ECM app if he was to be accepted.
Then again.. theres a reason why this server has died under the watch of you as the "RP LEAD"
You are a sad person for getting insecure and letting it out over your friends App.
-SUPPORT
While it does seem that you're well-versed in RP and the proper experience to back it up, going straight to ECC upon your return is frankly a cocky move. Ethics does need more members and stability but going straight to ECC off the bat is unacceptable, ECM would be pushing it as is. You would've had more success going back to ECA and then as you get re-established continue up the line to ECM and ECC. Also if you somehow get this, it'd take away from current and soon-to-be ECMs.
You seem to have 50% of the popular vote and although it takes charisma to hold any CL5 position, your anger issues seep out clearly. I don't always see eye-to-eye with Cade and some of his ideas but here he rightfully called you out here and your reply showcases what could potentially happen to anyone criticising you. Any ECM, ECA and O-1 under your command would be potentially subject to this behaviour.
The issue of you just dipping out randomly must be addressed too. The possibility of CL5.. let alone a SR. CL5 just leaving whenever would be catastrophic for server health and could potentially damage Ethics for the next several months, it's already in a questionable state with its lack of members and if you came and left within a few weeks it would basically kill it right then and there.
I'm just a nobody in all of this but Ethics and O-1 are my old home and I wouldn't want to see both eat shit just because you won a popularity contest, sorry.
While it does seem that you're well-versed in RP and the proper experience to back it up, going straight to ECC upon your return is frankly a cocky move. Ethics does need more members and stability but going straight to ECC off the bat is unacceptable, ECM would be pushing it as is. You would've had more success going back to ECA and then as you get re-established continue up the line to ECM and ECC. Also if you somehow get this, it'd take away from current and soon-to-be ECMs.
You seem to have 50% of the popular vote and although it takes charisma to hold any CL5 position, your anger issues seep out clearly. I don't always see eye-to-eye with Cade and some of his ideas but here he rightfully called you out here and your reply showcases what could potentially happen to anyone criticising you. Any ECM, ECA and O-1 under your command would be potentially subject to this behaviour.
The issue of you just dipping out randomly must be addressed too. The possibility of CL5.. let alone a SR. CL5 just leaving whenever would be catastrophic for server health and could potentially damage Ethics for the next several months, it's already in a questionable state with its lack of members and if you came and left within a few weeks it would basically kill it right then and there.
I'm just a nobody in all of this but Ethics and O-1 are my old home and I wouldn't want to see both eat shit just because you won a popularity contest, sorry.
