Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:634694900
Discord name: toastey
For how long have you played on CG SCP: Roughly 700 hours to date.
Age: 25
In what country are you located?: Canada
Time zone: EST/EDT
Character name(s): Toaste 'Pup' W. (F); Kylmä 'Koira' P.K. (CI); 'Anathema' (GOC)
Civilian name: Kitty 'Kibby' W.
What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA): SCP-RP UK
Do you have a mic?: Yes.
-
List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held: MTF E-11 SPC, MTF Nu-7 SGT, UNGOC SPC [0638], Executive Researcher, CI-B [TEU-LCPL]
-
Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?: 2x expired RDM from when I was new to both GMod and the server (~50 hours on steam), 1x old FailRP/NITRP ban for some unfortunate late night shenanigans involving 008 that I self-reported, 1x expired FailRP warning, 1x FearRP warning
-
Discord name: toastey
For how long have you played on CG SCP: Roughly 700 hours to date.
Age: 25
In what country are you located?: Canada
Time zone: EST/EDT
Character name(s): Toaste 'Pup' W. (F); Kylmä 'Koira' P.K. (CI); 'Anathema' (GOC)
Civilian name: Kitty 'Kibby' W.
What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA): SCP-RP UK
Do you have a mic?: Yes.
-
List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held: MTF E-11 SPC, MTF Nu-7 SGT, UNGOC SPC [0638], Executive Researcher, CI-B [TEU-LCPL]
-
Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?: 2x expired RDM from when I was new to both GMod and the server (~50 hours on steam), 1x old FailRP/NITRP ban for some unfortunate late night shenanigans involving 008 that I self-reported, 1x expired FailRP warning, 1x FearRP warning
-
Why are you applying for Site Advisor?
Ignoring the usual personal wants to proceed, I also wish to see certain changes happen. As an executive, I'm very knowledgeable on the research department and what current flaws and struggles it has in regards to the Site Administration aspects. I wish to have the chance to change and influence this in a positive way that I as an executive currently don't have. I've got many plans for what I would wish to do should I be given the role, and I believe that given my experience in the department, and good relations with all of the research command, I'd be able to contribute meaningfully and positively towards the current flaws that exist, and work towards a research department that functions both more and better than it currently does.
-
What makes you suitable for Site Administration?:
I have experience in the department which I would like to oversee, and I think that I bear good knowledge of each department's policies, as well as the FLC. My documents are always enjoyed by Site Admin from the feedback I've received and I would happily transfer those skills and have plans to create several documents that would further the state of roleplay and the research department. I've made multiple cross-department contracts between research and other departments as an executive and I think that I keep good relations with other departments; I always do my best to include everyone applicable in my testing, especially departments that I feel rarely get a chance to do or interact with RSD. I have some mild administrative experience just from my duties as an executive and I wish to foster this as a member of Site Admin. I currently have plans to rework the state of multiple present systems within RSD that are either poorly designed, under-utilized, or underdeveloped, and I think that as Site Admin, and with the skills and knowledge I have regarding both the department itself and with people, true change can be made.
I'm always seeking to improve and excel, and I think this is one of the possible right next steps. I have conducted my work to an extremely high standard as an executive, my documents are crafted to a high standard, and I bear a good understanding of the responsibilities of a Site Advisor. I think that I mesh and gel well with most people, and hope that I may prove this further.
-
What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?:
- Policies:
- While the FLC is beyond the scope of SA's abilities, Site Administration is a good point of contact to offer input and thoughts to Site Command for possible changes. They are additionally response for both jurisdictional policy, the division policy, and the evacuation procedures, and also may create new procedures and policies when necessary. They also have good oversight of departmental policies.
- Overseeing departments:
- Site administration is responsible for overseeing, reviewing, and supporting near every department and MTF on site, with the exception of Site Command and ISD/AO. They ensure that each and every department is functioning as it should, and recommend changes where needed, or provide input more directly under Site Command purview;
Site Administration is responsible for holding meetings with each and every department they oversee, being an available point of contact and a place to report problems or concerns; - Site Administration is also responsible for stepping in when simple monitoring and advice does not work. If departments are failing in some major way, Site Administration is responsible for stepping in and making the correct changes under cooperation with MTF COs or departmental leaders, or removing the leadership if the circumstances warrant it.
- Site administration is responsible for overseeing, reviewing, and supporting near every department and MTF on site, with the exception of Site Command and ISD/AO. They ensure that each and every department is functioning as it should, and recommend changes where needed, or provide input more directly under Site Command purview;
- Tribunals & The FLC:
- The EC has granted the power of tribunals to Site Admin, and with this, they may act as judges, jury, and etc., in conjunction with SC. They enforce the FLC when appropriate and are the most often candidate aside the ethics committee for presiding tribunals as judges.
- Departmental Leader Applications:
- One responsibility of site administration is to appoint the leaders of departments which site administration is responsible for doing so. While the appointment itself is the sole decision of the Site Director, all of site administration provides feedback and thoughts on each candidate.
- Site Administration, especially the Site Director, manage applications for DoEA and DoM.
- Interaction with GoIs/other factions:
- Site administration is often the main point of contact for GoIs such as the UNGOC for getting documents signed and things approved. While DEA and SC also manage this to a great extent, Site Admin is also responsible for maintaining relationships with GoIs.
- Site administration is also responsible for denying/authorizing GoI access to the site, most often, and they also authorize and/or deny many tests.
- General day-to-day work and overseeing the site status and function:
- Site administration is often responsible for managing the current codes of the site and authorizing lockdowns of certain areas of the site;
- Guiding departments in the short-term and long-term, providing feedback, and as stated previously, acting as a point of contact. They deal with day-to-day incidents and provide good judgement on any given situation;
- Authorizing things such as Advanced Armory during breaches;
- Additionally, Site Administration must provide authorization for other things. Several tests within the research department may be approved by site administration, be it cross-tests, the use of equipment during tests, or overruling a DoR's choice should the circumstance be mandated. Site administration also authorizes alterations to departmental policies to applicable departments and MTF.
- Departmental changes, maintaining & Implementation:
- Site administration oversee departments, and as such, are responsible for numerous documents. They must maintain all of these documents and ensure policies are updated as needed, and perform general administrative work over all applicable departments and MTF.
Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:
Toaste W.'s Personnel File
Things I plan to get up to:
- Working with the current DoRs to oversee areas of improvement and providing insight;
- Providing suggestions to the current DoRs regarding the rework of the current state of the document grading system; as a mutual executive has said, the current system doesn't work very well. It drains executives and the DoR dry of funds, and there is no basis or general consensus on what is 'good' vs. 'excellent' vs. 'exemplary'; changes have been made, but I believe there is more to be desired;
- Suggesting new methods of incentivization and engagement;
- Rework and clarification of policies; with the help of the current DoRs, I wish to see some of the murky/redundant policies clarified or changed, and missing ones added;
- Encouraging the creation of, or creating cleaner handbooks and policy documents, and ensuring that each and every department and regiment has high standard documentation;
- Implementation of new systems to aid the research department.
- Providing suggestions to the current DoRs regarding the rework of the current state of the document grading system; as a mutual executive has said, the current system doesn't work very well. It drains executives and the DoR dry of funds, and there is no basis or general consensus on what is 'good' vs. 'excellent' vs. 'exemplary'; changes have been made, but I believe there is more to be desired;
- Suggesting new methods of incentivization and engagement;
- Rework and clarification of policies; with the help of the current DoRs, I wish to see some of the murky/redundant policies clarified or changed, and missing ones added;
- Encouraging the creation of, or creating cleaner handbooks and policy documents, and ensuring that each and every department and regiment has high standard documentation;
- Implementation of new systems to aid the research department.
Donator
![Jessy Soul [XD-4]](/community/data/avatars/m/3/3443.jpg?1662483101){kind=avatar}
