Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:577294507
Discord name: noob_numeralix
For how long have you played on CG SCP: Time played (1 year achievement in-game)
Age: 19
In what country are you located?: Czech Republic
Time zone: CET
Character name(s): Valentyn Ilja Konrad
Civilian name: Fenromann Gustav
What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA): SCP-RP UK
Do you have a mic?: Yes
Discord name: noob_numeralix
For how long have you played on CG SCP: Time played (1 year achievement in-game)
Age: 19
In what country are you located?: Czech Republic
Time zone: CET
Character name(s): Valentyn Ilja Konrad
Civilian name: Fenromann Gustav
What server are you applying for? (SCP-RP UK or SCP-RP USA): SCP-RP UK
Do you have a mic?: Yes
List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
Holding:
Site Advisor
Held:
Site Director [+ Manager & Advisor]
Ethics Assistant
Overseer Assistant
CI-C DELCOM
Medical Consultant
ISD Investigator
O-1 SGT
E-11 CPL
Nu-7 PVT
UNGOC PVT
Holding:
Site Advisor
Held:
Site Director [+ Manager & Advisor]
Ethics Assistant
Overseer Assistant
CI-C DELCOM
Medical Consultant
ISD Investigator
O-1 SGT
E-11 CPL
Nu-7 PVT
UNGOC PVT
Why are you applying for Site Director?:
I believe that after spending some time in Site Administration again, I am ready to take on the responsibilities & duties of the Site Director. The Site Administration has been without a director for way too long, and I believe I have what it takes to become one.
I enjoy my time in site administration; however, I would love for it to be full again. Without a director, that is impossible. Having more hands on the deck would give site administration bigger perspective on issues and stuff that site administration has to handle.
SD is arguably the best role on the server. The freedom you have is something not found in any other role. You are not shrouded in secrecy like O5 or have to hide your real purpose like EC, yet have the power, at least on the site, on par with them. It gives you a lot of freedom to work with, and that is something that I love about it.
I believe that after spending some time in Site Administration again, I am ready to take on the responsibilities & duties of the Site Director. The Site Administration has been without a director for way too long, and I believe I have what it takes to become one.
I enjoy my time in site administration; however, I would love for it to be full again. Without a director, that is impossible. Having more hands on the deck would give site administration bigger perspective on issues and stuff that site administration has to handle.
SD is arguably the best role on the server. The freedom you have is something not found in any other role. You are not shrouded in secrecy like O5 or have to hide your real purpose like EC, yet have the power, at least on the site, on par with them. It gives you a lot of freedom to work with, and that is something that I love about it.
What makes you suitable for Site Director over Site Advisor?:
First and foremost, comes my prior experience in Site Administration. I believe that my past experience will help me acclimate much more efficiently to the position of Site Director, which would mean that I could start "working" on 100% efficiency much quicker. It will also help me analyze problems and come up with solutions to them much quicker than most of the other people would be able to. This also means that I won't need much guidance on how to effectively deal with stuff (this, however, doesn't mean that I wouldn't be in contact with anyone, since I believe that communication is the one thing that this server is entirely dependent on, and is something that makes everyone's life 10x easier). Please don't take this as me bragging about stuff that I have done, that is definitely not what this is supposed to be. I just believe that honesty is the best policy, and the Site Director position is very different from any other role on the server, and it takes a long time to get used to.
When it comes to my character qualities, I believe that, as I said earlier, honesty is my greatest asset. When I see something being done wrong, I am not afraid of calling it out. I usually do this privately though, since I do not want to publicly shame anyone, if it can be done like that. When I actually do call someone out though, I do it in a way of constructive criticism, and I tell the person what he should be doing instead and WHY. 9/10 times, when you only order someone to do something, they are either going to a) do it but resent you for it, since they won't understand why they should be doing so, or b) don't do it altogether, forcing your hand into nuclear options, for something that could have been easily avoided.
I am not arrogant or overly stubborn. When someone gets into an argument with me about something, I don't resent him for it; on the other hand, if someone presents to me some valid points, I am not against admitting that my opinion is the inferior one and actually implementing his way of things. This has happened to me on multiple occasions in the past. The only thing I expect from these conversations though, is mutual respect and understanding of both opinions.
I am fair. I have always been someone who was against blatant nepotism, and I hate it. As they say, treat others as you would like to be treated. If people come to me with concerns about someone, I always look at both parties and question them separately. After that I try to be the mediator if it is possible, and punish people fairly, via punishment befitting the crime mindset about it.
The mindset I have about this server is that it is a game, someplace you go to have fun and not be needlessly stressed. That is something that I find almost most important here, since when you are treated like a work-slave, you will burn out very quickly or even lose all of your passion for the server, which is the worst case scenario. If there is something that you want to do, but don't know how to, I am almost always free to talk to (Be that in-game or on discord, even if I won't get this role, you are free to come to me with stuff you need help with).
As for roleplay that I have created on SA, I usually go for more of a passive approach with stuff, and once someone brings stuff to me, I try to help them refine it into something even better (Tests, requests, etc.). As for what I have been actively doing, I would say that somewhat regular Q&A stands in front of medbay are a great thing that I have been doing. They both create roleplay for people who are already familiar with most of how our site works (Silly questions, A lot of incriminating & leading questions, Questions that are there to make you angry and show a reaction), and they can be very informative for the newer player base (Happens a lot, with a lot of genuine questions).
I truly do believe that site administration is here to allow a stable flow of RP. Yeah, of course, the possibilities are endless for SA when it comes to actively creating RP (I myself haven't done anything large scale, but moreso a lot of smaller interactions that are gradually going to turn into bigger stuff), but with how the site is structured, you need a lot of permissions from SA for bigger RP to take place. What I love about that the most is that I can actively help out people who are trying to create RP, not only by authorising it, but also by giving them my own ideas to take into consideration (If they are open to it, of course, I wouldn't force anyone into doing something they don't want to in this case). One other example of this was enabling specialist researchers to sign and authorize CL3-CL3 cross-tests. The meetings that took place were quite enjoyable and also productive in the grander scheme of things. Basically, roleplaying out changes to the site or in policies can also be enjoyable RP when done correctly, even If people don't agree with them.
First and foremost, comes my prior experience in Site Administration. I believe that my past experience will help me acclimate much more efficiently to the position of Site Director, which would mean that I could start "working" on 100% efficiency much quicker. It will also help me analyze problems and come up with solutions to them much quicker than most of the other people would be able to. This also means that I won't need much guidance on how to effectively deal with stuff (this, however, doesn't mean that I wouldn't be in contact with anyone, since I believe that communication is the one thing that this server is entirely dependent on, and is something that makes everyone's life 10x easier). Please don't take this as me bragging about stuff that I have done, that is definitely not what this is supposed to be. I just believe that honesty is the best policy, and the Site Director position is very different from any other role on the server, and it takes a long time to get used to.
When it comes to my character qualities, I believe that, as I said earlier, honesty is my greatest asset. When I see something being done wrong, I am not afraid of calling it out. I usually do this privately though, since I do not want to publicly shame anyone, if it can be done like that. When I actually do call someone out though, I do it in a way of constructive criticism, and I tell the person what he should be doing instead and WHY. 9/10 times, when you only order someone to do something, they are either going to a) do it but resent you for it, since they won't understand why they should be doing so, or b) don't do it altogether, forcing your hand into nuclear options, for something that could have been easily avoided.
I am not arrogant or overly stubborn. When someone gets into an argument with me about something, I don't resent him for it; on the other hand, if someone presents to me some valid points, I am not against admitting that my opinion is the inferior one and actually implementing his way of things. This has happened to me on multiple occasions in the past. The only thing I expect from these conversations though, is mutual respect and understanding of both opinions.
I am fair. I have always been someone who was against blatant nepotism, and I hate it. As they say, treat others as you would like to be treated. If people come to me with concerns about someone, I always look at both parties and question them separately. After that I try to be the mediator if it is possible, and punish people fairly, via punishment befitting the crime mindset about it.
The mindset I have about this server is that it is a game, someplace you go to have fun and not be needlessly stressed. That is something that I find almost most important here, since when you are treated like a work-slave, you will burn out very quickly or even lose all of your passion for the server, which is the worst case scenario. If there is something that you want to do, but don't know how to, I am almost always free to talk to (Be that in-game or on discord, even if I won't get this role, you are free to come to me with stuff you need help with).
As for roleplay that I have created on SA, I usually go for more of a passive approach with stuff, and once someone brings stuff to me, I try to help them refine it into something even better (Tests, requests, etc.). As for what I have been actively doing, I would say that somewhat regular Q&A stands in front of medbay are a great thing that I have been doing. They both create roleplay for people who are already familiar with most of how our site works (Silly questions, A lot of incriminating & leading questions, Questions that are there to make you angry and show a reaction), and they can be very informative for the newer player base (Happens a lot, with a lot of genuine questions).
I truly do believe that site administration is here to allow a stable flow of RP. Yeah, of course, the possibilities are endless for SA when it comes to actively creating RP (I myself haven't done anything large scale, but moreso a lot of smaller interactions that are gradually going to turn into bigger stuff), but with how the site is structured, you need a lot of permissions from SA for bigger RP to take place. What I love about that the most is that I can actively help out people who are trying to create RP, not only by authorising it, but also by giving them my own ideas to take into consideration (If they are open to it, of course, I wouldn't force anyone into doing something they don't want to in this case). One other example of this was enabling specialist researchers to sign and authorize CL3-CL3 cross-tests. The meetings that took place were quite enjoyable and also productive in the grander scheme of things. Basically, roleplaying out changes to the site or in policies can also be enjoyable RP when done correctly, even If people don't agree with them.
What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?:
Be the Leader of Site Administration
One of the things that is specific to the Site Director position (who would have thought). Whenever there is an internal issue within Site Administration, it is the Director's duty to deal with it as diplomatically and efficiently as possible. Not only that, but the Site Director should be the face of SA and act professionally at all times when on it, since a lot of the actions he takes can then reflect on the rest of the Site Administration. Being there to help out other members of Site Administration is also extremely important, since when you are not able to do so, for what purpose are you really in the position?
Alpha Warhead activation in Site Command's absence
Well, this is pretty self-explanatory. When Site Command is either not on site or is unable to activate the warhead, but the activation of it is needed for upholding the server health (And when they are on site and active, with their permission is what I would get as well).
Appointment of Departmental Leaders & Other members of SA
This is one of the most important roles of the Site Administration. Site Administration is in charge of choosing almost all of the department's Directors/Chiefs (excluding the ISD director, who is chosen by the Ethics Committee). This duty comes with a responsibility of choosing a good-fitting department leader, so you have to give your own personal opinion and the experiences you had with this person. When the person passes the application process, an interview process begins, during which you have to listen attentively to the person's answers and rate the answers and then give verdict, with other members of SA, of course.
Liaisoning for departments under Site Administration
When you become a member of the site administration, you will be given a department (or two) to oversee for the month (This usually falls on site advisors, but if the site administration is not filled, it can be a duty assigned to Site managers, or even the Director). To effectively oversee a department, you have to be in frequent contact with the members of the department, especially their leadership, make sure their documentation is in order, make sure they are doing what they are supposed to be doing and make sure that there are no issues with the department from the administrative standpoint, meaning the leadership is doing what they should be doing and they are striving to better the department. For a Site Director, this changes a little bit, since he is supposed to be overseeing how Site Administration is faring in the liaisoning. If the department is failing very badly, and the leadership is unable to change it, it is up to SA to come up with solutions.
Site-wide policies management
This is done with the cooperation of Site Command. Basically, this means that if there is either a problem with already existing site-wide policy, there would have to be a meeting with site command (Or just OOC discord conversation) about it, where people would give ideas on how to make the existing policy work or if it just wouldn't be better to remove the policy altogether, or when there is a completely new problem and no policy is created to combat it, it is duty of SA and SC to create one that would remove the problem or minimize its harm on the site.
Groups of Interest Supervision for the site
Even though usually dealing with GoIs goes to the DEA; however, when there is either a big proposal or a problem concerning the entire site, SA should take part in dealing with it. One of the main things that SA should deal with is a policy, treaty or a deal that is meant to target the entire site and the entirety of the GoI the site is making the deal with (MOAT, for example). Everything should go first through DEA though, if it isn't something to do with SA directly, then SA will deal with it, however they should make sure that DEA is aware of such talks happening and kept in the loop about it, just to make sure they can work efficiently with the GoIs.
Day-to-day operation of site
There are a lot of duties that fall under this category, and I am going to list some of them here.
Authorization of usage of AA during breaches
Mass-termination of D-class (When no Ethics is on-site)
Distribution of site forces when dealing with multiple threats (E. g., CI is somewhere in the facility, GOC is raiding, and there is a breach simultaneously)
Closing of certain parts of the site when there is a cross-training taking place (For example, a cross-training between E-11 and Nu-7 that was allowed to take place in HCZ, HCZ would be closed for a certain time, but only long enough to make sure that it does not disrupt the site functions for an awfully prolonged period of time).
Authorizations of certain requests (This can be, for example: RSD excursions on surface, partial shutting off reactors for maintenance, Departmental funding, etc.)
Staying up to date
Not exactly a duty that is written anywhere, but it definitely is one of the most important responsibilities there is for SA. When SA member is not staying up to date with their department, they cannot effectively do their duties. When you are not up to date with your departments, you cannot give any constructive feedback, tips, or even any guidance on how to make a problem better, since you do not know that the problem exists. Same thing with the GoI supervision, if you are not aware of the site's current standing with the GoI or their recent actions, you cannot be of any help with the treaty creation since you do not know what to demand or what to give in exchange. As I have said, I believe this is one of the most important responsibilities as SA, but even when you are one of the departmental personnel, staying up to date is not going to make your life any worse.
Be the Leader of Site Administration
One of the things that is specific to the Site Director position (who would have thought). Whenever there is an internal issue within Site Administration, it is the Director's duty to deal with it as diplomatically and efficiently as possible. Not only that, but the Site Director should be the face of SA and act professionally at all times when on it, since a lot of the actions he takes can then reflect on the rest of the Site Administration. Being there to help out other members of Site Administration is also extremely important, since when you are not able to do so, for what purpose are you really in the position?
Alpha Warhead activation in Site Command's absence
Well, this is pretty self-explanatory. When Site Command is either not on site or is unable to activate the warhead, but the activation of it is needed for upholding the server health (And when they are on site and active, with their permission is what I would get as well).
Appointment of Departmental Leaders & Other members of SA
This is one of the most important roles of the Site Administration. Site Administration is in charge of choosing almost all of the department's Directors/Chiefs (excluding the ISD director, who is chosen by the Ethics Committee). This duty comes with a responsibility of choosing a good-fitting department leader, so you have to give your own personal opinion and the experiences you had with this person. When the person passes the application process, an interview process begins, during which you have to listen attentively to the person's answers and rate the answers and then give verdict, with other members of SA, of course.
Liaisoning for departments under Site Administration
When you become a member of the site administration, you will be given a department (or two) to oversee for the month (This usually falls on site advisors, but if the site administration is not filled, it can be a duty assigned to Site managers, or even the Director). To effectively oversee a department, you have to be in frequent contact with the members of the department, especially their leadership, make sure their documentation is in order, make sure they are doing what they are supposed to be doing and make sure that there are no issues with the department from the administrative standpoint, meaning the leadership is doing what they should be doing and they are striving to better the department. For a Site Director, this changes a little bit, since he is supposed to be overseeing how Site Administration is faring in the liaisoning. If the department is failing very badly, and the leadership is unable to change it, it is up to SA to come up with solutions.
Site-wide policies management
This is done with the cooperation of Site Command. Basically, this means that if there is either a problem with already existing site-wide policy, there would have to be a meeting with site command (Or just OOC discord conversation) about it, where people would give ideas on how to make the existing policy work or if it just wouldn't be better to remove the policy altogether, or when there is a completely new problem and no policy is created to combat it, it is duty of SA and SC to create one that would remove the problem or minimize its harm on the site.
Groups of Interest Supervision for the site
Even though usually dealing with GoIs goes to the DEA; however, when there is either a big proposal or a problem concerning the entire site, SA should take part in dealing with it. One of the main things that SA should deal with is a policy, treaty or a deal that is meant to target the entire site and the entirety of the GoI the site is making the deal with (MOAT, for example). Everything should go first through DEA though, if it isn't something to do with SA directly, then SA will deal with it, however they should make sure that DEA is aware of such talks happening and kept in the loop about it, just to make sure they can work efficiently with the GoIs.
Day-to-day operation of site
There are a lot of duties that fall under this category, and I am going to list some of them here.
Authorization of usage of AA during breaches
Mass-termination of D-class (When no Ethics is on-site)
Distribution of site forces when dealing with multiple threats (E. g., CI is somewhere in the facility, GOC is raiding, and there is a breach simultaneously)
Closing of certain parts of the site when there is a cross-training taking place (For example, a cross-training between E-11 and Nu-7 that was allowed to take place in HCZ, HCZ would be closed for a certain time, but only long enough to make sure that it does not disrupt the site functions for an awfully prolonged period of time).
Authorizations of certain requests (This can be, for example: RSD excursions on surface, partial shutting off reactors for maintenance, Departmental funding, etc.)
Staying up to date
Not exactly a duty that is written anywhere, but it definitely is one of the most important responsibilities there is for SA. When SA member is not staying up to date with their department, they cannot effectively do their duties. When you are not up to date with your departments, you cannot give any constructive feedback, tips, or even any guidance on how to make a problem better, since you do not know that the problem exists. Same thing with the GoI supervision, if you are not aware of the site's current standing with the GoI or their recent actions, you cannot be of any help with the treaty creation since you do not know what to demand or what to give in exchange. As I have said, I believe this is one of the most important responsibilities as SA, but even when you are one of the departmental personnel, staying up to date is not going to make your life any worse.
Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:
Personnel File
Personnel File
Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Resources Team
Game Master
