Rule Suggestion UNGOC Senior Position Rank Increase

Rule suggestions will be reviewed by Superadmins, this may take longer than standard content suggestions.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Aphex

Aphex

Game Master
Game Master
One Year Club Two Year Club Three Year Club Conversation Starter
Jan 27, 2022
792
160
111
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Change the ruling for 1.17, wherein a person cannot hold another senior position while also being unable to be a UNGOC LT. CI members can make it to DELCOM while holding a Senior Position, I don't see why the same cannot apply for UNGOC.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Unsure, possibly.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Allows current senior position holders to get to GOC LT without breaking any rules.
Makes the ruling align with CIs BCOM+ limit.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
I believe the rule is to allow more non-senior position holders to access GOC REGCOM and to reduce burnout for senior position holders, so of course this is a negative if it was increased.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Currently, UK GOC needs more COs, and I believe this would have a minimal negative effect. If someone is burned out on GOC, they can make an LOA/ROA, or even just resign from the position. If this needs to be tested beforehand, then go ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Acey and Change Z. "The Coward"
Upvote 23 Downvote
Easton Maker said:
Nu-7 and E-11 are the exact same, (unless the rule changed, idk because I'm banned from discord.) Honestly the jump from Cl3 to CL4 is worse for them more then GOC.

Edit: GOC Attaches rank in the chain is their actual rank outside of attache
Click to expand...
The argument isn’t exactly the same for MTF COs because being an LT in O-1 and A-1 would create possible metagame operations between the two, but I guess the same could be said for CI and GOC.

Sure, make MTF CPT count as the limit instead of LT, I don’t see an issue unless it’s pointed out to me.
 
Aphex said:
The argument isn’t exactly the same for MTF COs because being an LT in O-1 and A-1 would create possible metagame operations between the two, but I guess the same could be said for CI and GOC.
Click to expand...
I mean, IIRC right now I'm pretty sure you can't make multiple Foundation characters, which means that all MTFs will be mutually exclusive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back