[US] King 'Crusader' O5-4 "The Technocrat"
- Thread starter KingCrusader911
- Start date
- Status
Head Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Content TeamIn my opinion I don't not know you a lot but just from the actions you give CI and such, I'm a -support on this. Recently with you just authing the use of 008 whenever CI wanted to breach it kinda ruined server health quite a bit and with you possibly getting O5, you would have a lot more access to stuff that would impact server health more. Other than that, I haven't had any experiences with you either due to different time zones or due to just not seeing you active a lot.
- Jan 8, 2023
- 611
- 145
- 111
-Support for the App
The application feels pretty lackluster, and I’d deny it based on quality alone. The standards for this position should be high, it’s not something to take lightly if we want to build a progressive, engaging, and welcoming environment.
On top of that, the applicant only holds two whitelisted positions, both of which are primarily combative roles. That kind of experience doesn’t necessarily translate well to a role that requires creativity, initiative, and the ability to shape meaningful RP or organizational direction. Purely combative experience doesn’t reflect that mindset, and that’s where this application ultimately falls short.
Good person, bad application.
The application feels pretty lackluster, and I’d deny it based on quality alone. The standards for this position should be high, it’s not something to take lightly if we want to build a progressive, engaging, and welcoming environment.
On top of that, the applicant only holds two whitelisted positions, both of which are primarily combative roles. That kind of experience doesn’t necessarily translate well to a role that requires creativity, initiative, and the ability to shape meaningful RP or organizational direction. Purely combative experience doesn’t reflect that mindset, and that’s where this application ultimately falls short.
Good person, bad application.
- Support
gonna borrow words of another, Good person, bad application
Never cared for server health and made RPing with CI highly difficult to work with. Using AI was the cherry on top cause just shows low effort, like if you're gonna use AI at least edit it... Nothing against king as a person but I wouldn't trust them with a position like O5.
gonna borrow words of another, Good person, bad application
Never cared for server health and made RPing with CI highly difficult to work with. Using AI was the cherry on top cause just shows low effort, like if you're gonna use AI at least edit it... Nothing against king as a person but I wouldn't trust them with a position like O5.
=========================
Secure Message Received.
Decrypting...
Opening File Message.
=========================
From: The Office of Site Inspection
To: 'The Executioner'
Subject: Regarding Your Application
Secure Message Received.
Decrypting...
Opening File Message.
=========================
From: The Office of Site Inspection
To: 'The Executioner'
Subject: Regarding Your Application
[ REQUEST FOR OVERWATCH COMMAND ELEVATION: DENIED ]
Commander 'The Executioner'
WE HAVE READ YOUR REQUEST.
WE WILL BE MOVING FORWARD WITH OTHER APPLICANTS AT THIS TIME.
CONTINUE IMPROVEMENT.
"Progress at any cost"
Sincerely,
Chief Site Inspector Jackson
[DATA EXPUNGED]
Commander 'The Executioner'
WE HAVE READ YOUR REQUEST.
WE WILL BE MOVING FORWARD WITH OTHER APPLICANTS AT THIS TIME.
CONTINUE IMPROVEMENT.
"Progress at any cost"
Sincerely,
Chief Site Inspector Jackson
[DATA EXPUNGED]
- Status