Denied [US] New RP rule change

[Aura]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove
It would make it so if a person or group had a reason to do something they could I.E (let tech experts start to revolt if they are getting their union broken up and attack others to free people)

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?
I don't know

Possible Positives of the Suggestion
1: Lets people RP more in different ways
2 makes sense and could lead to some funner events without an event having to get planned
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
1:Could lead to people rdming others for stupid reasons(admins will have to use their brains for once)
2:Admins could be overrun with false sits
Based on the Positives and negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted
This could allow for the server to be affected by the players and lead to some neat events

 

[Naffen]

this doesnt need to be a server suggestion, this is more of a Ethics/O5 FLC change regarding Unionising which is an IC rule not OOC rule

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

US is wilding

 

[Playdoughzombie]

this doesnt need to be a server suggestion, this is more of a Ethics/O5 FLC change regarding Unionising which is an IC rule not OOC rule

I think he means like allow non combatives to be combative in situations like that where they are unionizing but people of their union are getting arrested

 

[Playdoughzombie]

I think he means like allow non combatives to be combative in situations like that where they are unionizing but people of their union are getting arrested

Still a bad idea.

 

[Speff]

US is wilding

you have no idea

 

[Charles "Ze" Whittme]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove
It would make it so if a person or group had a reason to do something they could

That's just...RP?

 

[Change Z. "Somebody"]

That's just...RP?

This can't be... RP!!.. IN A RP SERVER!!! ban this man. get him out of my sight.

 

[SamPaval]

This is... a bad idea

It turns all None combative combative cause they can just get some friends say "we're unionzing" then mass kill

 

[Aura_]

Imo, these could just be done by Gamemasters whenever they want to as impromptu minor events. These types of events should be controlled, and not too often. Otherwise, it could just get abused by some minges looking for any excuse to rdm.


Nice name btw

 

[Aura]

this doesn't need to be a server suggestion, this is more of a Ethics/O5 FLC change regarding Unionising which is an IC rule not OOC rule

not just unions but a whole range if subject coups,assassination,Etc shit like that

 

[Cary “Raven”]

-SUPPORT
This can be done by gamemasters but uncontrolled I think its an extremely bad idea and it just gives minges more reason to rdm

 

[Charles "Ze" Whittme]

this doesn't need to be a server suggestion, this is more of a Ethics/O5 FLC change regarding Unionising which is an IC rule not OOC rule

not just unions but a whole range if subject coups,assassination,Etc shit like that

So you want us to... allow unions and revolt? What?

 

[Rushi]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi @Aura,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion because this is not something for suggestion. Changes to IC policies must be done by contacting Site Leadership (O5/Ethics/SA). However, for the examples that you provided, you should ask for staff for permission before doing something too extreme.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.​