[USA] Michael's Request for Elevation to Site Administration

Status
Not open for further replies.

VictorVonKraut

Civil Gamers Expert
Oct 30, 2024
37
2
61
SITE ADVISOR APPLICATION
SCP-RP USA

"I am the Executioner of the Sins of this Site, and of the Foundation as a whole" - Michael "Adjudicator" Krenik



Steam ID:STEAM_0:1:148427089
Discord Name:lucifersmorningstar
Age:22
Country:USA
Time Zone:EST
Character Name:Victor Von 'Grimoire' Kraut | Michael "Adjudicator" Krenik (MIA | ISD COMMISSIONER)
Francis Krenik (Medical Sr Doctor)
Civilian Name:Marcus Arailious
Applying For:SCP-RP USA
Microphone:Yes



SERVICE HISTORY

For how long have you played on CG SCP:
I have played on Civil Networks now for over a year and more actively in the past few months.

List all whitelisted, MTF, or CI roles that you hold or have held:
  • Research Director (HELD) - JAN 2025-APRIL 2025
  • Executive Researcher (HELD) - NOV 2024 - JAN 2025
  • Board of Education Director (HELD) - NOV 2024 - JAN 2025
  • ISD Investigator (HELD)
  • ISD Inspector (HELD) - APRIL 2026 - MAY 2026
  • ISD Commissioner (HOLDING) - MAY 2026

Have you received any kicks/bans/warning? and why?:
No. I have maintained a clean record.



APPLICATION RESPONSES
Why are you applying for Site Advisor?
I believe that I am a very good candidate for the Site Advisor role due to several factors;
  • To begin with, I am a heavy roleplayer, which is already a essential quality required to serve as a Site Advisor in the upper echelons of the Foundation. Having contributed heavily to the roleplay of the Internal Security Department as it's Legal Affairs Commissioner. I believe I can continue to bring that level of roleplay and direction to the entirety of Site 65.
  • I also wish to assist my department even more by possessing a Site Administration position where not only can I continue to support them by offering more chances to develop interesting roleplay, but also become a judiciary for them to continue to have exciting legal rp.
  • Third and while it is selfish, I do honestly want to advance my career on Site-65. Trust me I have been waring with myself for the past few weeks with all these positions opening, do I go for it or do I not? I feel like there is still so much I can do for the Internal Security Department but I also realize that I can do even more for them by occupying higher ranks. To support them and all departments by bridging gaps and improving co-operation and communication.
So yes while I think it is way too early into my tenure as a Commissioner to seek even higher stations, I feel like I can do even better for my department by serving in this position and by that extension to the entirety of Site-65 by brining my craziness to the Site Administration team.

What makes you suitable for Site Administration?
First thing that makes me suitable for Site Administration is the fact I have served as a Department Director, and a Senior CL4 in two different departments demonstrating my ability and understanding of how the site functions from multiple perspectives.

My time as the Director of research taught me how to manage a department that was dying, especially when the DoR who was suppose to train you retired before he could. It taught me to be resourceful and bold to usher in new life, to be creative and guide new researchers on the path to excellent roleplay, and it taught me that as a leader that you must take responsibility for the failures of others while guiding those people on the right path.

My experience within Internal Security has also given me a strong understanding of discipline, investigations, and the importance of maintaining order on the Site. Serving in ISD has shown me what it takes for Site Administration to be fair. They must understand that every order they give and their decisions affect the site as a whole.

I do believe that this background makes me a well rounded candidate, because I understand the needs of departments, the importance of policy, and the necessity of communication between leadership groups. I am comfortable taking that responsibility, and making the difficult decisions to keep our site functional.

My time with DoR also taught me another valuable lesson that it is okay to take a break, play the game, enjoy some fun and do stupid things every once and while to avoid becoming too burnt out. Which is why even more that I seek to continue my career because I do not like how I left it off and now I want to do more, to help, to lead.

On a less serious note, I also happen to meet three other very important qualifications:
1: I was a DoR meaning the agenda of the SCIENCETEAM! remains alive and well on Site-65 for Research Controls ALL.
2: I am not currently a DoR meaning appointing me would not gut another DoR before we even have a chance to appoint another one.
3: Just like my predecessor Bayzli, I come from Internal Security, so in a way, it is almost like getting the same Site Advisor experience twice.

What are the responsibilities of Site Administration in RP?
The responsibilities of Site Administration are vast and highly important to the overall function of the site. They serve as one of the three primary leadership bodies on Site-65, ensuring that departments operate efficiently and receive the support and funding they require in order to perform their operations.

They are also task with a plethora of document work such as reviewing requests for a weapons permit, elevating personnel in clearance levels, authorizing high risk and specialized testing, ensuring justice and order are properly administer, improving communications between departments , handling sensitive communications and relations with Groups of Interest, and participate in high level meeting that affect not only our Site but the Foundation as a whole.

We act as guides to resolve conflict and support departmental leadership for the site as a whole, making sure that our site can operate independently of Site Inspection and the Ethics Committee while they focus on the Foundation on a global scale, and when they come and visit and inspect the site that we have all the documentation and proof ready to show that we did a amazing job.

Please give some lore about your Site Administration character and what storylines they would be involved in:
[MICHAEL "ADJUDICATOR KRENIK] "STATUS: DEEP COVER"
Multiple files regarding Michael are classified this is the lore that everyone would see and a few extra details because why not.

Michael Caesar "Adjudicator" Krenik
AGE: 40
HIEGHT/WEIGHT: 6ft 1in/ 180lbs
EYE CLR: BLUE
HAIR COLOR: BROWN


"Michael "Adjudicator" Krenik did not rise through the ranks of the Foundation because he is beloved, it was because he was useful." - Late Ethics Chairman Alistar Graves

To most personnel, Krenik was the image of order made flesh. The Commissioner of Legal Affairs and a chief officer in the Department of Internal Security. A enigmatic figure whose very presence reminds all that every action has a resounding consequence. He is articulate, disciplined, and brutally efficient often speaking in policy rather than plain English. Yet behind every word he said lied a threat that the law is a weapon he mastered.

Krenik's entire career was bult on exposing corruption, prosecuting traitors, dismantling departments that shield their people, and forcing them to answer for their failures. He became known commonly as the "Adjudicator" for he rarely moved without certain evidence being established before hand. Every arrest, every tribunal, every motion, every investigation appeared on the surface to follow a well documented pattern of authority. He filed orders, compelled discovery, subpoenaed records burying his enemies beneath the weight of their own violations until there was no room to run.

This made him extremely valuable to the Ethics Committee, where others see a harsh man the Committee say a necessary one. You see Krenik understood the Foundation's ugliest truth, what is it you ask? Well it the fact that morality in the Foundation is never clean, it was just "acceptable". With his work in the office of Legal Affairs and the Internal Security Department this made Krenik precisely the kind of candidate the Committee was looking for to install covertly in the Administration of sites in the Foundation.

Eventually the Committee began to quietly move and eliminate the paths allowing Krenik to seize the position of Site Advisor at Site-65, for this site required deeper ethical oversight and he was already trusted by command. He would be able to identify abuse of power from within and covertly report it to the Committee without altering other personnel.

To the public? Krenik's appointment as Site Advisor would be framed as a reward for loyalty and exceptional service, but the truth it was just another assignment.

The Ethics Committee would position him inside Site Administration to watch for corruption and internal conspiracies, and he would be expected to report and intervene when necessary. Giving him access to conversations, records, and decisions most ISD officials could never touch. This was the perfect role for him, but that is the problem, it was too perfect.

You see the Ethics Committee does not know that Michael Krenik is not merely hunting corruption, he himself has become corrupted by the hunt.

Somewhere along the way, Krenik stopped believing justice was something that the Foundation served, instead he began to believe it was something he alone understood. Codes became tools, and evidence became clay for him to mold into prefect theater. To him, the guilty were not entitled to protection simply because the law failed to move fast enough or preserve the chain of custody for evidence. If a murderer escaped judgement, a traitor hid behind rank, a witness threatened to collapse an entire operation, Krenik came to see their continued existence as a defect in the pursuit of Justice.

And defects in his mind, must. be. corrected.

Rumors followed him for years, though no one has ever survived long enough to levy charges against him. Personnel who violated the Foundation law disappeared before trial. Witnesses with inconvenient testimony were reassigned, amnesticized, or found dead under circumstances classified above the investigators he personally assigned to investigate. The reports always found conclusions however none of them ever pointed at Krenik.

Those close to him have noticed a contradiction in his beliefs. He condemns unlawful killings in court but praises "necessary endings." Demands evidence from others while burying his own. Speaks constantly of accountability but fails to take it on himself. He believes the Foundation is rotting from within, but instead of saving it, he appointed himself the sole executioner of its sins.

From this point of view Krenik does not see himself as evil, no that is too simple, he sees himself as the final consequence. That the law is sacred but only to the point that justice is served. When the system fails and protects the guilty, he believes that someone must be willing to do what it can not admit it needs. He is not motivated by greed, or traitorous loyalties, but a ideological obsession with his vision of justice. That is what made him dangerous. He truly believes that every single crime he commits is a sacrifice for the greater good.

Every erased witness, every silenced offender, every single case he manipulated, every execution hidden behind walls of bureaucracy is justified by one sole reason. The Foundation survives only because someone is willing to drench their hands in blood and still call it dutiful service.

With this appointment to Site Advisor the Ethics Committee made a unwilling mistake allowing him now to judge the site from above while still acting below in the shadows.

The worst thing is? He may actually genuinely save Site-65 or the Foundation as a whole from corruption. Remove dangerous people and traitors preventing wide spread disaster. He may even be remembered as one of the most effective administrators this site ever had.

But if anyone ever uncovers the dark truth? They will realize the same thing Krenik realized a long time ago...

The Foundation did not create a Guardian.

It created the Devil who believes judgment alone belongs to him.



FINAL STATEMENT

I'm going to be quite honest in saying that I don't mind if I am not selected for the position. I still have a lot to do with Internal Security and even if I am accepted I will still play as a Inspector and help my department as much as I can. However this is a opportunity I can not pass on, and it would allow me to assist them in a much broader view by improving relations, assisting in directing policy changes, and creating more RP for them.

Thank you for taking the time to review my application.
 
Denial page.png


Good Afternoon @VictorVonKraut

Unfortunately, you have not been selected for the Site Advisor role.

I understand this may not be the outcome you were hoping for, but I encourage you not to let it discourage the valuable work you’re currently doing.

If you would like to discuss the decision or receive feedback, please feel free to get in touch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.