Partially Accepted AO Operative Gun Change

Content that has been partially accepted
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[This would give O-1 Operative the AN-94 and the A-1 Operative the EBR.]

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Plenty of weapon changes have been put forward for AO but the difference is now that we have 2 unused guns already balanced for their respective classes in need of their own non-perma gun.]

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[This would allow for both jobs to have their own original guns.
This would make use of guns already in the server.
This would not be overpowered and in need of balance as they have already been balanced.
This would add more active weapon diversity fulfilling the point of adding the new guns.
]

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[I can't at this time think of a negative for the this, beyond the weapons being put on a job without slot limit, but they are on a regiment with a 25 cap and near never more than 10 on.]

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[As stated, the guns are already balanced and unused and would allow for more weapon diversity to the server.]
 
-Support
51egGUjqP0L._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
 
Jul 9, 2022
38
5
111
+Support
i think all MTF and even GOI should have guns that are not accessible by the armory. This adds a good variety to everyone's kit so not every gun fight that you get into is ARX,VHS,FHR. These guns use to be Iconic but now its gotten pretty stale.....
 
Here's my two cents on the topic.

For approximately one and a half years O-1 US Complained about the AN-94 hit reg and why we believe it should be changed, Two of those members being both 'H.U.N.K' and 'Kilo' (The original poster) it is to my knowledge that members from A-1 whether that be US or UK I don't know complained about the EBR. Now that such changes have happened and we got the gun change we've been asking for NOW A-1 wishes to revert/Change Operative guns to the guns that were complained about. In my opinion this change should not occur and the AN-94 should remain as a weapon for CI COM/LTCOM. The EBR can be re-given to A-1 CO's if they want I don't care it's their regiment though the Operative guns if changed for AO shouldn't be prior guns we've already had issues with. With this said I'll be -Supporting this as I do not believe this would benefit Omega-1.
 
Here's my two cents on the topic.

For approximately one and a half years O-1 US Complained about the AN-94 hit reg and why we believe it should be changed, Two of those members being both 'H.U.N.K' and 'Kilo' (The original poster) it is to my knowledge that members from A-1 whether that be US or UK I don't know complained about the EBR. Now that such changes have happened and we got the gun change we've been asking for NOW A-1 wishes to revert/Change Operative guns to the guns that were complained about. In my opinion this change should not occur and the AN-94 should remain as a weapon for CI COM/LTCOM. The EBR can be re-given to A-1 CO's if they want I don't care it's their regiment though the Operative guns if changed for AO shouldn't be prior guns we've already had issues with. With this said I'll be -Supporting this as I do not believe this would benefit Omega-1.
if not the AN-94 Would another Rifle warm your thoughts on this just from a point of weapon diversity
 
Status
Not open for further replies.