Partially Accepted AO Operative Gun Change

[Kevin Ki]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
[This would give O-1 Operative the AN-94 and the A-1 Operative the EBR.]

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
[Plenty of weapon changes have been put forward for AO but the difference is now that we have 2 unused guns already balanced for their respective classes in need of their own non-perma gun.]

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
[This would allow for both jobs to have their own original guns.
This would make use of guns already in the server.
This would not be overpowered and in need of balance as they have already been balanced.
This would add more active weapon diversity fulfilling the point of adding the new guns.]

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
[I can't at this time think of a negative for the this, beyond the weapons being put on a job without slot limit, but they are on a regiment with a 25 cap and near never more than 10 on.]

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
[As stated, the guns are already balanced and unused and would allow for more weapon diversity to the server.]

 

[Joe "Enoch"]

I didn't think O-1 would have a issue with it as
1. The gun was fixed, and when it was a SL even came into O-1 comms to let them know it was fixed

The fix that the devs made for it was the model. when they updated the server it fucked up a bunch of models like the freedom and the AN-94. If you were to look around with these guns out the attachments would remain facing north (or south) so you could not see anything.
Broken AN-94 (Photo of this bug) msg link of the Change log
That was the issue that was fixed nothing else about hit reg.

What I didn't take into account when making the suggestion was how people who never even got to O-1 CO (to use the gun they so greatly hate apparently) would swarm because a CO said to, not bothering to test the gun after the fix devs made for it.

The reason why non O1 Cos are commenting is because we have used the gun before. We know how bad it is and that we do not want it.

 

[Kevin Ki]

The reason why non O1 Cos are commenting is because we have used the gun before. We know how bad it is and that we do not want it.

What I didn't take into account when making the suggestion was how people who never even got to O-1 CO (to use the gun they so greatly hate apparently) would swarm because a CO said to, not bothering to test the gun after the fix devs made for it.

No problem with COs voicing their opinion, but when you have Enlisted or NCO deciding to join a VC or TS and start getting loud with people because of a suggestion, yes I'll start to have a issue. Made the parts you seemed to miss bold texted in this reply.

 

[Auburn]

Suggestion Partially Approved​

---

Hi Kevin,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.
The Content Team has chosen to partially accept your suggestion for the following reasons.

We agree with your point that the Guns on A1 and O1 Operative have lost their charm. However, the guns they will receive will not be the ones proposed in the suggestion due to the overwhelming amount of complaints they received/issues they held.
Their guns have been replaced with the CQ300 Lynx and the AK-74m stat matched to the pre-nerf ARX-160 and VHS-D2 respectively

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as partially accepted.​