What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
The ability to use Tranquilizers during combat. A rule / ruling that doesn't allow tranquing people during comba
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I believe not
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
1. It makes combat more fair for anyone going against personnel constantly using the tranq. It feels unhealthy and doesn't make sense for a tool that you can be FearRP'd if you're holding also create a controlled situation in a 1 on 1 situation with a hostile faction like CI if they're hit with said weapon.
2. Only a small number of members spawn with this weapon afaik, creating an unfair weapon advantage for that department, when it was created as a tool to arrest players and now being used against raiders.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Less tools to counter / combat raid
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
The tool tranquilizer reminds me of the taser RMP used in MilitaryRP, which was a tool they only had in their regiment and you were not allowed to taser players outside of your own faction, making it a tool well used for law enforcement and not abused for raiders or combat against other factions. It's unfair a tranquilizer non hostile weapon that is used to arrest foundation personnel also be abused against CI during hostile combat, basically not allowing them to move or shoot their weapon. Doesn't make sense you can FearRP someone holding a tranquilizer as it is not considered a weapon but it has been said if the person shooting the tranq hits the player, it will be turned into a controlled situation vs the paralyzed player. Also feels unfair that they abuse it to get kidnaps out of CI when we are in the middle of a gunfight.
It's like combat cuffing but an additional step where you stun the guy in combat before you cuff him. This suggestion will overall improve combat between hostile factions and create less abuse with a weapon that should be meant to detain Foundation Personnel.
The ability to use Tranquilizers during combat. A rule / ruling that doesn't allow tranquing people during comba
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I believe not
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
1. It makes combat more fair for anyone going against personnel constantly using the tranq. It feels unhealthy and doesn't make sense for a tool that you can be FearRP'd if you're holding also create a controlled situation in a 1 on 1 situation with a hostile faction like CI if they're hit with said weapon.
2. Only a small number of members spawn with this weapon afaik, creating an unfair weapon advantage for that department, when it was created as a tool to arrest players and now being used against raiders.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Less tools to counter / combat raid
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
The tool tranquilizer reminds me of the taser RMP used in MilitaryRP, which was a tool they only had in their regiment and you were not allowed to taser players outside of your own faction, making it a tool well used for law enforcement and not abused for raiders or combat against other factions. It's unfair a tranquilizer non hostile weapon that is used to arrest foundation personnel also be abused against CI during hostile combat, basically not allowing them to move or shoot their weapon. Doesn't make sense you can FearRP someone holding a tranquilizer as it is not considered a weapon but it has been said if the person shooting the tranq hits the player, it will be turned into a controlled situation vs the paralyzed player. Also feels unfair that they abuse it to get kidnaps out of CI when we are in the middle of a gunfight.
It's like combat cuffing but an additional step where you stun the guy in combat before you cuff him. This suggestion will overall improve combat between hostile factions and create less abuse with a weapon that should be meant to detain Foundation Personnel.
Last edited: