Rule Suggestion SCP-912 'Riot' Clarification

[JasonTheCheesyGuy]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Rephrase SCP 912's rule that states;

• May only enter inner D-block if a riot is ongoing and it is ordered to enter by security personnel

To either clearly define what constitutes a Riot (Outside of a simple 'C2 is active', as a C2 can be activated by any Cl3 personnel for any reason), or to be rephrased so as to be independent of Site-Codes.

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not that I know of

Possible Positives of the suggestion:
Provides additional clarity to players of SCP-912.
Prevents misuse of SCP-912.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
???? Less abuse of 912 or smth? I dunno man- This seems like a pretty clear pure benefit to me.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
You can actually know what SCP-912 can/cannot do.

 

[Shaunpai]

-Support

The rules are pretty clear about this man

 

[Advil Smith]

-support you can’t call a riot just because you want to call a random code there has to be a reason IC

 

[JasonTheCheesyGuy]

-support you can’t call a riot just because you want to call a random code there has to be a reason IC

Yep! This is actually the core part of why I made this suggestion.

When do you call a Code? This is something that is entirely up to player interpretation, with no clarification from the rules about when a riot is taking place. What does this result in? A riot being able to be called for anything that anyone decides for themselves determines a riot.

Leaving an SCP's rules up solely to player interpretation is a problem IMO.

 

[Glazzing]

-support cope suggestion

 

[fyzar]

Yep! This is actually the core part of why I made this suggestion.

When do you call a Code? This is something that is entirely up to player interpretation, with no clarification from the rules about when a riot is taking place. What does this result in? A riot being able to be called for anything that anyone decides for themselves determines a riot.

Leaving an SCP's rules up solely to player interpretation is a problem IMO.

"i dont like roleplay i want every action that i do be dictated by server rules"

 

[Emilia Foddg]

When do you call a Code? This is something that is entirely up to player interpretation, with no clarification from the rules about when a riot is taking place. What does this result in? A riot being able to be called for anything that anyone decides for themselves determines a riot.

Leaving an SCP's rules up solely to player interpretation is a problem IMO.

"I'll take FailRP for $200, Alex"

If people are calling C2s for anything other than a riot, that's not player interpretation, that's just FailRP.

 

[Advil Smith]

Yep! This is actually the core part of why I made this suggestion.

When do you call a Code? This is something that is entirely up to player interpretation, with no clarification from the rules about when a riot is taking place. What does this result in? A riot being able to be called for anything that anyone decides for themselves determines a riot.

Leaving an SCP's rules up solely to player interpretation is a problem IMO.

I’m against rule play in every situation if something can be solved in character then staff shouldn’t need to get involved we already have too much of this. This can be dealt with in character for example by contacting ISD.

 

[Advil Smith]

"I'll take FailRP for $200, Alex"

If people are calling C2s for anything other than a riot, that's not player interpretation, that's just FailRP.

This aswell ^ if it’s just a random code 2 sure contact staff but say there is 4 pistols instead of 5 guns contact ISD