Recent content by Charles "Ze" Whitmee

god no.

(Seems my post was deleted by the forum kerfuffle) -Support I'll state that I do not hold a grudge regarding my removal. As it stands I do not believe you are fit for Site Director, from watching and interacting with you as ECM during my time as Site Manager I cannot recall any RP you have...

I might just... Regardless, What RP have you created during your time as ISD commissioner?

Please use any other font and make the application look normal, cant read this at all.

we are so back +Support

It's a Gmod server. And this is a Junior CL4 position. He can come and go as much as he wants, this aint a job.

Major support just for this.

@Rat_King @SamPaval

Dear lord, why are all you posts in black text.

That's not even what the suggestion is about

I expect a perma ethics.G90 please.

A natural Code 5 can develop further, that's fine. vs One D-class sat in HCZ that SCPs "ignore" as he hacks out all the others. Low pop mass breaching should be a relic of the past.

Suggesting again (and a tad simpler) because I want to see this for breaches. "We will be accepting this on the basis that this will only be possible when SCPs are not breached. This is to revitalise Research RP and give more interesting interactions for players to experience."

This. I see 20+ CI sat online doing nothing but shoot and sit AFK for the next raid, effectively 1/5 of an RP server occupied by a Regiment that does not conduct RP. Iffy on this, however I support it for raid limits. Because it makes total sense that CI can raid with more people then the...