Recent content by Emilia Fοddg

terrible

+/- Neutral Instead of adding job bloat, I'd rather a system where you can give a specific player on a job a keycard for some specified length of time so you can create RP without having to worry about your keycard getting nuked by a breach, but for some reason that gets denied, because...

+Support, please add

Bro I can't even join an AO reg I've been applying for a good 2 years now

CL4 roles are not obtainable in general

>Be Cadet >GenSec at the time is populated only with Cadets >Try to give 912 an order >912 refuses RP 📈

+Support Simple QoL for upgrades. Everyone wins @Herr Kvarkar you get to put that new CNUI stuff to good use

+Support I also think non-breached 912 should get debuffs from being damaged to very low health, so that gensec actually have to value it instead of using it like some unbreakable tool I agree with the general consensus of not wanting to destabilise riots in favour of D-Class, but the way...

+Support If this is also combined with a revision of SCP levels needed per SCP

+Support I don't agree with the exact proposed implementation, but I still think ERT being outright immune to 173 is stupid, I'd be fine with smth like TP attacks dealing only so much damage so it needs multiple hits to kill, but outright being able to stop 173 is dumb I mean yeah, instakill is...

+Support Give DEA thermonuclear warheads as a warfund

No nesting?

+Support. Didn't realise this wasn't a thing. Probably really difficult to do, but yeah, firmly agree.

https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/scp-rp-rules.2244/ I actually couldn't find the specific stipulation about ISD Unless I'm wrong, it could be a specific discord announcement or otherwise a hidden ruling 🥴 Honestly IMO, if something's going to be enforced as a rule, it should be...

+/- Neutral I'M SO FLUMMOXED! Like... Yes? But also at the same time... No. So probably no. I get why? But no.