Recent content by Emilia Foddg

I just wanna join A1 😭

This concept is going to be difficult to try and get across, so try and bear with me as I attempt to write it out. This also ended up being one of my infamous long suggestions in an attempt to try and elucidate the idea and its importance. Sorry! 🫠 Although I can't really engage in discussion in...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Implement an expansion of, or system similar to surface SCP queueing - But for other jobs, to be used for when a job's slots are full. Which specific jobs this may apply to would generally be up to the discretion of CT, but I am primarily proposing...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Hide notifications of blockedphys or worldtool protection changes from normal users. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: I recall there being suggestions about similar things - The only thing that...

+Support While the doors as they are, are nice and very faithful to Containment Breach, the general intuition that the result is impractical for a server environment. In most cases, we are pushing the limits of what the Source Engine can do and provided that this contributes to that in any...

I agree, Cartographers should be able to produce a second instance of themselves with which they may escort themselves. Multibox Cartographer. +Major Support

Decontamination foam applicator, but mostly just colloquially referred to as the 'foam gun' +Support Anyway, let loose the Janitors of war (on dirt)

-Support I don't know if this is still the case, but on UK, Officers can be a security escort to most CL3 tests, which usually end up being HCZ tests of some form. Granted, the Researcher (or in some cases, addition E-11 escort) in that circumstance can also panic button, but having the Officer...

-Support This has been suggested countless times and always denied on the basis that not only can SCUs be reliably trusted with this access, but giving too much BD access to F makes breaches more unfair against SCPs, as well as raids being unfair to CI/GOC. As a former E-11 CPT and current 096...

Give it 5 velocity for a minute instead and I'm down. +/- Neutral

I agree generally, but If you think something's a bug, why did you open a suggestion thread and not a bug report ticket? 🫠 And IIRC we've been through this whole thing with several different models so chances are that this is known to an extent. The problem being that prior solutions just...

Fuse the ormat. "Asking for certain SCPs to be able to speak" is in the FAS as something that is usually insta-denied, too. I get why - However that addition came about because of both a 452 suggestion (...which... should definitely be able to speak, if you've read its page) and a 999...

+Support Sure, but I want an SCPs comms line too, between SCPs and RSD. RSD: /scp hey 096, do you wanna test? 096: /scp AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA RSD: /scp great!

+Support It didn't work like this already?

I vaguely recall this having been requested and denied in the past back when Warfunds were GOC's unique mechanic -I forget the reasoning, but honestly? +Support Although it would obviously need to be accompanied by a rule that you can't use it to curveball raids ala amnestic grenades. But...