As a former UK E-11 CPT that failed to change the regiment from the inside, I can tell you right now that this isn't something they're going to willingly do themselves. SL intervention here is justified IMO
let's break this down here
what's the first part of "permaban" short for?
looking through it, it looks pretty bleak. if you weren't directly told that the ban is with no opportunity to appeal, it's probably worth at least privately asking staff if you are able to appeal it, but even then just...
IIRC, the TS requirement is something that is actively imposed by the actual roleplay groups themselves (At least on UK, I know that CI and all MTFs absolutely require that you join it when joining)? So even though it's not an IC thing, it's weirdly an IC enforcement? I agree with the idea of...
+Soft Support
More of a long-term endeavour than anything.
EDIT:
That being said, this is definitely an appropriate direction to take new SCP development - In terms of "normal" SCPs, we've kinda sorta saturated everything? So this would end up being pretty fresh.
What would lowkey be really...
That makes sense - This is only a guideline to give an idea of what the thought process should be going into changing access permissions. Are you at least interested in any access changes and/or other access-related QoL changes along the same vein?
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion asks for several QoL adjustments to be made to headcams, firstly and most importantly:
A likely known issue regarding facewear on models obscuring headcams - When viewing the headcam of a lot of combative jobs, there's things like...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.