Recent content by Emilia Foddg

The idea is very similar to this planned feature, but the problem is that this specific feature is in development hell. I don't mind it being contextualised like this though, if anything that this idea creates could contribute to that. +Support

I agree - The intent of the dev tracker was never to set an expectation that it would automatically be implemented or some final arbiter of "This will happen". There have been many accepted suggestions and other planned ideas in the past that there were intent to develop, but ended up ultimately...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Add either or both of the following to D-Block showers: A keycard stash A grenade stash (Like the accepted gun stashes idea, but only for grenades (and if that feels too much, I wouldn't mind just limiting it to smokes & flashes, maybe a few types...

+Support It seems conceptually sound, but personally I'd like to see an art dev's opinion on the general feasibility of this over the course of however long. even If it's at all possible.

+Support I think the CI Cartographer should get a SWEP that spawns a second CI Cartographer controlled by the same player.

Honestly yeah, Parawatch could use a little bit of content, as their gameplay loop is kinda nonexistent. Not sure what to add though - Keycard storage I think is a nice idea, though. I think being able to better facilitate the whole long-term RP of "Look, one of the Canadian Military guys...

I think this was implemented with the recent changes, at least the DEA part

If it's doable in a way that doesn't create too much filesize bloat, sure. My understanding is that the pipeline for these things is kinda weird. Gmod is very funny when it comes to models in general. This is just generally the case for any "new X job model" type situation. +Support

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Consider relocating 012 to CI Base. The relocation would be accompanied by a GM event wherein CI basically heist 012, establishing that they now have it. This would have to be a consideration done following the upcoming CI Base rework - How to handle...

This specifically isn't decided by Content Team - This is decided by IC RP leadership roles, and is also specifically a massive US skill issue as IIRC, 076 is allowed to passive breach on UK, lmao Anyway, I agree with the general premise, as discussed in the past thread, 076 on the server just...

Affirm. Chef is a way better job for minging than Tech Expert these days, anyway.

I thought this was how it worked in the first place 😭You're telling me I've been throwing money away? I've probably tossed about 50k's worth into the void for kicks Auburn refund me pls

+Support However, I have one issue - You state And while this does come across as an overall E&TS rework, the prop placer idea feels very odd-one-out. I don't see how something like that is not separate and intrinsically unlinkable from everything else here.

+Major Support I acknowledge the concerns previously raised, but ultimately believe that the fun potential outweighs the abuse potential. We now have warfunds implemented as we kept wanting - And one of the big reasons given in the past as to why we couldn't have warfunds, was that they needed...

Definitely, we should remove 012 because a D-Class resisted testing for me once, citing that I was just "taking them to a gas chamber" 👽 But also, I feel like if you gave the community the choice between removing 860 and removing 012, they'd pick 012.