PAC/Lore Approved
Hello @Marrio Tazuul ,
Your PAC3 Request has been approved.
Any changes to your Character Bio/PAC3 will have to go through the process of being accepted again.
Kind regards, Merrick
PAC/Lore Approved
Hello @CherryBones ,
Your PAC3 Request has been approved.
Any changes to your Character Bio/PAC3 will have to go through the process of being accepted again.
Kind regards, Merrick
E-11 enlisteds needing override to 99% of HCZ as well as not being the correct clearance to know about all of the SCP's in that area is wild, Unless you make an exeception about the knowledge.. in which case.. what is the point really?
Instead they can do 4000 damage because you dont get sent out of range..?
Knockback is the (as far as i know) only real draw of the AA-12 as it's damage is rather mid. Plus, I like funny ragdolls. the fact that the only positives to this suggestion are combat player brained, I -Support.
overrides exist, Also response unit exists, the MTF tryout requires you play as a cl1 anyway (cadet) so like... ?
I do think they should retain the knowledge afforded to them as clearance 3's just due to the nature of their work if this does go through (Handy little image of the uk clearance...
This post is some S Tier ragebait
A lot of people can't make time to work in a department, and for those departments that have no limitations like Junior CL4 roles I could see a system changing, but places with limited slots like MTF's, CI, Senior CL4, CL5 positions this just isn't feesible...
In a world where people "crashout", Flag onto D-class, Then immediately beeline and hack out two SCP's because they got minorly inconvinced in a video game.
I said Typically, Sometimes you don't have 1 for 2 or so weeks. Sometimes you do. But my point is that it's a self imposed limitation...
This is one of those big boy suggestions that'll be discussed to death in content team threads... either that or someone will remember "Oh yeah this is up", 50/50 really
D-class obtaining TE-5's and a single weapon is not difficult, Especially since most d-class will inherantly head straigh to 914 that can facilitate them stronger weapons like PKM's and disguises. You're vastly underestimating a competent D-Class.
A suggestion to solve an IC issue, How delicious.
This isn't an issue on UK, infact UK combat medic bunks has an armory in it, We just yknow... Close the door.
Your math isn't correct to begin with.
currently (Atleast for UK) we typically have 1 008 breach a week. that's 52 breaches a year, that's a self limitation so just to be kind to d-class, I'm gonna assume they do 2 a week. that's 102. That's 27% chance. if I add in CI's breach as well that's a...
I did genuinely think this was a troll suggestion but i've now realised you are serious
This goes without any hesitation that I am -Supporting this suggestion imo
"My source is that I made it the fuck up" - 4% is a wild number to pull as someone who definitely doesn't observe how much this...
It also makes zero sense for say a D-class being able to handcuff someone highly trained in CQC or just with military training like MTF. But here we are.
I do not believe this should apply to beams. Shields and knives are already considered weapons and you cannot be cuffed whilst holding them...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.