Search results

Just wanted to add a quick experience I had, 173's containment cell was broken, and stuck open, The tech that arrived couldn't fix it as they physically couldn't reach the door at the top of the door-frame. I had to crouch and the tech had to stand on my head to fix it. This is a exact scenario...

+Support Most people look down , This doesn't work (Except for when it does sometimes for some reason?), and I assume it's due to source limitations. This could be a more consistent way to avoid viewing 096. It would be nice if looking down just worked properly, but that's wishful thinking...

While I understand the vision, and the factor of a crazy prisoner with nothing to lose. Encouraging Class-D to be more combative is something I cannot support. -Support

+Support There's already a names field, no need for a separate one.

Foundation can't use tear gas on CI due to the powerful area of effect attack (Even though there's a counter with the gas masks) CI gets a repeating grenade launcher and grenade launcher call in. With a even more powerful area of effect attack. I'm not opposed to CI having grenade launchers...

Exactly this The problem isn't the strike mission existing, It's when it right after, Basically killing the cooldown in some situations.

Correct. I should have used the word Alternative instead. I'll edit my reply to reflect that.

I agree that secondary itself may not be the best choice for a spawn, That's far from the only option. HCZ breach shelter springs to mind, It's pretty out of the way. Medbay area was also mentioned, and that would help prevent that. In general, I do think too many suggestions get held back by...

+Support AA restrictions make sense balance wise for GOI, as it's easy to obtain and very powerful. Organizations would also have motive to avoid using weapons causing too much destruction. For D-Class (Without external help) it is difficult to obtain. And they are prisoners with little to...

+Some Support The ability to push would be very useful. There is a large concern for misuse however.

How could this be abused? (Or at-least, Abused more than any other alternative spawn?) Edit: Replaced the word secondary with alternative as people were understanding that to mean Secondary Checkpoint.

Where did you get that information from? The GSD handbook states otherwise.

Very good idea. +Support

+Support Just have it show Steam ID.

+Support Also a long ladder, so you can rescue the people who escape 106 and end up on the vent or other inaccessible areas.

+Support I play SCU, Having to wait for E-11 is not ideal as they are busy fighting the breach. If there can't be override due to abuse concerns, This is an ideal compromise. Allowing them to fight the breach without the inconvenience to E-11.

I appreciate the reply. I'm not sure on how to best explain this, but I'll try. You are correct that you are supposed to be able to do testing during a code, However with how things are on US (Not sure about UK) you can't, If a breach happens your escort 9 times out of 10 decides to take the D...

You can drop it?!!?!??!

A skill check instead of the current system where it's a dice roll could be a interesting change, it's frustrating having to defib one person 50 times. That being said, Defibs are far from "Overpowered"

I completely agree that numbers alone are flawed, since even the smallest of changes can count. A person cannot reasonably focus on that alone. However, as a player, it certainly feels like it's more combat focused than before. And the breach change from a few months ago that you mentioned...