Search results

If it’s not this hard then it can be removed form other jobs i guess? Like why does CI have to be the only faction who has to sit at a dispenser and wait for a 10 and 15 minute cooldown.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Gives CI deepcover handcuffs and elastics Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: Yes, my reasoning I will go into more in depth but for now I'll respond to the previous denial I found for elastics a...

+Support

IMO no, when you give a techie a cl4 they act like a dpt head which doesn’t work at all on US atleast.

o7 Glad you got the nuke and broke the curse

Hi just to clarify for everyone, ISD doesn't care about AO blacklists or your IC actions on other jobs. We can take that into account based off context but that alone doesn't mean anything. There is plenty of people who do things on other characters and as long as it doesn't extend oocly it...

+Support you were fun to hold hostage

https://civilnetworks.net/community/threads/scp-rp-suggestion-format.3798/ The door is already lockable I think, just door charges are a thing.... If your suggesting it to be not door chargeable thats gonna make things worse because not even lakehouse has that and its a whole goi technically...

Follow format but uh -Support anything in parawatch spawn will get stolen quite often so not really useful

+support

-Support 1. This is a bad place to put that in the rules and 2. This isn’t needed, as long as parawatch are actually following the rules their pretty much an escaped d class except non combative. D class escaping is worse.

It shows steam id if they aren’t online I think

3/3 Im in Nu7 currently and in ci currently

-Support this would not fit on US server. Also nu7 have a juggernaut already. Grenadier is genuinely a nerf to ci depending on the user also

Oh I guess this is a positive too, GSD jobs are often used for tryouts and this would let them dispense multiple hacking devices

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Make TE4 a cl2 or cl1 from dispenser Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: no Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2): CI Alphas are able to hack uh thats really it Possible Negatives of...

Use format

+Support, mainly for the d class getting scrap. that would be a good way to do it

All O5 cards say on the cl4 is their number designations. Why does that need changed to a full title

+support, just because i dont want a character bio and having it not be required would be nice