Search results

I ain't afraid of no NL, so I'll ask it - Why does Yeke not do anything? (The CM) I'm kidding, I love you guys don't take this seriously pls.

MC&D should sell drone jammers and such. Behold, a gameplay loop ripe for the making.

Nah, remove the entire map. We will all roleplay, noclipping around in a big empty box. Meanwhile Level Design devs looking at this:

+Soft Support I mean, if this is a technical possibility, maybe instead of 'always', just drastically increase the load proximity of these specific high-trafficked area keypads. I get the reasoning behind all of this and generally agree, but there's no reason for say, D-Class keypads to be...

+Support At this point, I'm just watching this unfold, eager to see where it goes. This is peak entertainment.

+Support My understanding is that DEA (at least on UK) have spontaneously discovered the use of drones and made it the meta overnight, which is all well and good in terms of organically figuring out that you can get good and actionable information if you do X, Y & Z. But the problem therein...

o7

-Support I get the intention here, but as others have said, there are simply far too many issues with this to make it an actuality.

+Major Support + Very active and committed. + Has a wealth of CL4 experience, including in this position. + Excellent roleplayer. + Good to return.

+Support + Very active. + Have only had good interactions with this individual. + Decent CL4 experience. + Good fit for the position.

I mean, I would hardly call removing a HUD element a massive overhaul. But while I don't agree with your idea that, I otherwise agree with the general prospect.

+Support + Active. + Have only had good interactions with this individual. + Probably a good fit for the staff team.

I mean firstly, the present state of things hasn't reflected that for quite some time, with the split listing heavily towards combat - And secondly, while the RP/combat balance you mentioned is the general target, the fact that this is not a 100% SeriousRP server, does not in itself justify not...

+Support Although this was obvious, honestly. The only other thing I can think of, that I just realised, is that it might be inconvenient for staff to not immediately know what code it is in the context of maybe say, reviewing a clip of a potential rulebreak? Which could be relevant to specific...

Real talk, I think we should actually remove this, so that people will actually have to use the signs to learn what code is active.

+Support You know as well as I do that 99% of the time, this is generally not possible - Pedantry aside, I can think of one potential, pertinent issue which may prove fatal here, not only related to the implementation of E&TS as a fully-fledged department, but also as what would be a lingering...

+Support ...Alright, I like it. It's a good general idea and it makes sense at face value. But I wouldn't expect this to happen for a while.

+Support + Active. + Have only had good interactions with this individual. + Probably a good fit for the staff team.

+Support

Skill issue.