What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
-Would add the taser license back so high command and police regiment members would require one to use a taser.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
-No clue.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At...
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Limits the amount of tank suggestions that are being posted.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Nothing has been suggested before as this is a more recent occurrence.
Possible Positives of the...
-Support
Court cases usually happen because somebody has either requested one or because somebody has been investigated so to have one weekly would be too much for KGB/RMP as they would need to constantly be investigating stuff.
Having more regular court cases would be nice just not weekly...
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Fixes capture the flag, you get only 10 points from capturing the flag which don't really affect the outcome of the war you might as well go for kills instead of the flag.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion...
+Support
Unironically if enough people bought one it could work. Battlepasses encourage people to play to unlock everything so it could help keep players on of it doesn't cost too much money like £5 - £15. And Ventz will get more money so we might get more stuff.
As far as I am aware the majority of what I have listed has been brought up to NL and SL by other people and nothing has been done or they have been denied. I do believe that some NL, SL and devs care however at them moment it's not enough for the server.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
-Reduce MRP staff requirements, they have the same requirements as SCP staff on a server which has almost triple the amount of active players.
-Play the game, get SL to try and come on more consistently as well as the developers to see what the...
My point is that if they want to implement or change something that may benefit one side if the side it benefits has less active players a poll can easily be swung so that the change doesn't go in because the other side doesn't like it. And all the "community being heard" stuff just turns into...
Neutral
I definitely think some of the decisions that have been made haven't really benefitted the community and done more harm then good however I think the problem is that if there was a vote for something that benefitted one side over another it would be very easy to rig it. A lot of people...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.