Search results

You know I thought the same, but then again, this isn't like a "CI has a SCAR, I want a SCAR!!!" Suggestion, and the jobs are clearly intended to be mirrored, with fairly powerful weapons, and a specific set of tools.

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: Adds the vehicle repair tool to the UNGOC Officer job. Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: It actually has been, 2 years ago...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This suggestion modifies the gains that a faction (in this specific case, CI, GOC, Nu7, as noone else gets them) gets when doing a CMission, so that they are lowered based on the factions numbers. This would mean that if, say, GOC only had 4 members...

OCD ah +Soup I guess, no harm?

Please read about how this has already been done IC with it fully working IC with all risks acknowledged and handled IC. The suggestion is basically meaningless, but I won't have it that we can't do it 😭

On UK, I have already done this once, and plan to do this quite frequently. Due to the keycard printers existing, the only thing that I needed was a quick sit to get them onto the trainee model. All else was handled IC. There are some game limitations, mainly the fact that bio cards can't be...

Way too broad of a topic, not gonna lie! These are changes which, as people said before, literally seem like things present on site 9, just on 65, and would affect the entire server. You even acknowledge that people may leave because of this! I also see very little connection between basically...

This is a big problem I have with this suggestion, there are so many things actually suggested that a vote of "Yes" or "No" is not satisfactory. I agree with some of these points, but absolutely hate others, hence my only good option is downvote it. I would also argue that it therefore also goes...

"2.11 Hazmat Suit Disguising - Hazmat Suits cannot be used as an alternative for disguising" The way this is worded, technically 035 doesn't apply, but it would be in the same spirit. - Support

I mean ... +support, but this is literally a copy paste of a suggestion from like less than a week ago, with only like 3 lines cut out. So uh this DEFINITELY has been suggested before.

+Support to all BUT infils timer. They're basically a free raid, causing quite the disturbance already. Making it longer just amplifies the issue, and I have seen CI win infiltrations quite often, it's just a numbers issue for GOC specifically.

You know what, good point, that one I didn't think of much... I just kinda got into writing the suggestion and seems I lost the plot... Striked it out, if this somehow passes now 😭 Anyway, I still stand by basically all the rest. This is meant to be a suggestion as a more improved version of the...

What does this suggestion change/add/remove: This would implement the third person disabled zones which were present on MRP, at each factions base, which would activate during code 1's/5's. These would be located in only certain areas of the map, where combat is rampant, whilest specifically...

"IDK" he says, even though it was quite literally a feature, then got removed because the community hated it....

As both an MRP player and a DEA player, I have no idea what to think of this statement, so I will now implode. But uhhh yeah could be a good idea to get it in here, now that we're no longer an obstacle

I know the US mentality on this is different, but I would definitely love for DEA to be less "nudged" towards combat, and get more stuff done, having peace on surface would be great! (But then again, wouldn't happen) Maybe a war system like MRP? Keeps both surface combat going, allows peacetime...

Harry "The Mapper": Electric boogaloo +soup

+ soup

It's the whole point of MM, it's not meant to have anywhere near a good secondary. So uhh +/-

I'm very greedy, I need all of it for myself, so none can go to you