Denied Add multi-department private comms

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Auburn

Community Supervisor
Community Sup.
Group Moderator
Jan 2, 2023
322
191
21
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add the following Comms Channels
  • /sop
    • Visible to DEA, Nu7, ECA, OSA, SA, and SC
  • /mtf
    • Visible to ERT, E11, Nu7, A1, O1, OSA, ECA, SA, and SC
  • /isd
    • Visible to A1, O1, ECA, OSA, and SC
  • /ert
    • Visible to ERT, SC, and Site Director

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
  • Easy Communication between large groups
  • Less Metagaming

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
  • Coding time depending on how the addon was written

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
These channels were used before the comms rework for communication between multiple departments easily and securely. If anyone has any more suggestions post a reply and I'll add it to the list
 
Last edited:

SamPaval

Active member
May 26, 2022
1,171
160
21
Added, but not with E11 access as ERT is pertinent to a lot of classified info.
Sc and SA dont really be telling ERT classified stuff.

There ment to be the final containment team E-11 know of 682 and 008
 

SamPaval

Active member
May 26, 2022
1,171
160
21
Im talking about the Nuke being something ERT are aware of and can encourage SC to activate. E11 don't know about that
Then it isnt needed and instead can just use /c3 <ERT-SC>

No point in making a whole comms system just to say "hey we sucked nuke please"
 
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add the following Comms Channels
  • /sop
    • Visible to DEA, Nu7, SA, and SC
  • /mtf
    • Visible to ERT, E11, Nu7, A1, O1, OSA, ECA, SA, SC
  • /isd
    • Visible to A1, O1, ECA, OSA, SC
  • /ert
    • Visible to ERT, SC, and Site Director

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
  • Easy Communication between large groups
  • Less Metagaming

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
  • Coding time depending on how the addon was written

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
These channels were used before the comms rework for communication between multiple departments easily and securely. If anyone has any more suggestions post a reply and I'll add it to the list
+Support just would like to say you should add ECA/OSA to /sop
 

Goondra "Sleepy"

Active member
Dec 9, 2022
139
33
21
Suggestion Denied
Hi Auburn,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.
-
This is a new update and we are going to be testing the normal comms first - If we deem people like this new style we will start to add new comms and decide who gets added to them in the future - Please wait 3days - 1 week to test these comms first before any further suggestions

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.
Thanks Goondra​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.