Denied Add multi-department private comms

[Auburn]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add the following Comms Channels

• /sop
  • Visible to DEA, Nu7, ECA, OSA, SA, and SC
• /mtf
  • Visible to ERT, E11, Nu7, A1, O1, OSA, ECA, SA, and SC
• /isd
  • Visible to A1, O1, ECA, OSA, and SC
• /ert
  • Visible to ERT, SC, and Site Director

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

• Easy Communication between large groups
• Less Metagaming

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

• Coding time depending on how the addon was written

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
These channels were used before the comms rework for communication between multiple departments easily and securely. If anyone has any more suggestions post a reply and I'll add it to the list

 

[Boris.]

+Support

 

[Asp]

+support
sop comms channel is a must have

 

[Jacub]

+Support

You should also include an ERT channel visible to ERT, SA & SC.

 

[SamPaval]

+Support

You should also include an ERT channel visible to ERT, SA & SC.

If that is added E-11 should be in it.

 

[Auburn]

+Support

You should also include an ERT channel visible to ERT, SA & SC.

If that is added E-11 should be in it.

Added, but not with E11 access as ERT is pertinent to a lot of classified info.

 

[SamPaval]

Added, but not with E11 access as ERT is pertinent to a lot of classified info.

Sc and SA dont really be telling ERT classified stuff.

There ment to be the final containment team E-11 know of 682 and 008

 

['Moshi' Danin Brooks]

+Support
Dont see it as a bad implemention. Would be usefull if added.

 

[Auburn]

Sc and SA dont really be telling ERT classified stuff.

There ment to be the final containment team E-11 know of 682 and 008

Im talking about the Nuke being something ERT are aware of and can encourage SC to activate. E11 don't know about that

 

[Max Henry]

+Support

 

[grunger]

+

More communications channels for cross-regimental/departmental use would be useful.

 

[SamPaval]

Im talking about the Nuke being something ERT are aware of and can encourage SC to activate. E11 don't know about that

Then it isnt needed and instead can just use /c3 <ERT-SC>

No point in making a whole comms system just to say "hey we sucked nuke please"

 

[YoRHaUmbra]

+support

 

[Chad]

+support

 

[Second]

Then it isnt needed and instead can just use /c3 <ERT-SC>

No point in making a whole comms system just to say "hey we sucked nuke please"

Tbh most of this new system isnt "needed", but it implements a way to avoid FRP/Metagame in comms.

 

[Second]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Add the following Comms Channels

• /sop
  • Visible to DEA, Nu7, SA, and SC
• /mtf
  • Visible to ERT, E11, Nu7, A1, O1, OSA, ECA, SA, SC
• /isd
  • Visible to A1, O1, ECA, OSA, SC
• /ert
  • Visible to ERT, SC, and Site Director

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):

• Easy Communication between large groups
• Less Metagaming

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:

• Coding time depending on how the addon was written

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
These channels were used before the comms rework for communication between multiple departments easily and securely. If anyone has any more suggestions post a reply and I'll add it to the list

+Support just would like to say you should add ECA/OSA to /sop

 

[Auburn]

+Support just would like to say you should add ECA/OSA to /sop

Edited in

 

[Goondra "Sleepy"]

Suggestion Denied

---

Hi Auburn,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

The Content Team has chosen to deny your suggestion due to the following reasons.
-
This is a new update and we are going to be testing the normal comms first - If we deem people like this new style we will start to add new comms and decide who gets added to them in the future - Please wait 3days - 1 week to test these comms first before any further suggestions

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as denied.
Thanks Goondra​