Denied Add one additional job slot for Site Command Assistants

[Epicap]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
One additional job slot will be added for Overseer Assistants and Ethics Committee Assistants bringing each to a max of 3 on-site at a time.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
This is a request that the O5 / Ethics on US side have consistently heard since we have no cap on how many assistants we have, there are not enough slots for available players to use. This would put us back to 3 assistants on each side on site at once, which would be how it functioned previously without issue.
To reiterate, it would fulfill the unanimous request by the US O5 and Ethics.
It would allow players to actually be able to get on their job.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
By only adding one slot on each for a job where we train and trust assistants, I don't believe that an issue of size would be a factor, but that's the only slight issue I could think of with this.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This is a minimum effort job slot increase that does not require additional content and would satisfy many players needs on the server. That's low effort / high outcome productivity at its finest.

 

[Khan]

+ support for obvious reasons

 

[Sylveon]

+Support

I don't know why the Site-Command change limited the slots for this, considering the Position is a Junior Level 4. Assistants can help provide a lot of RP, specially when no Site-Command are present, and I believe the job capacity should be increased back to 3 for both.

 

[Dalton]

+ Support

This is really needed. Assistants too commonly ask others to get off the job (Not pointing fingers I do it too) A 1 or 2-slot increase would SOLVE a lot of problems.

 

['Scorpion' | 'Hitman']

+support

needed

 

[Green]

+Support

With so many ECA and OAs that want to be able to do their job this change is needed.

 

[Lafleur]

+ Support
Reasons stated above

 

[Derek White]

+ Support
Due to the reason of uncapping the Jr.CL4

 

[Harold Hawks]

+Support
Much work to do as OA, would like to have more slots.

 

[SquirrellyJr]

+Support for all the reasons stated above

 

[Florenzo]

+Support
What squirrelly said

 

[Otters]

+Support

This suggestion was denied quite a bit due to the fact that SC slots went down. It was made 2 to match the 4 SC respectively, however it would benefit the site quite a bit due to the increase of active assistants.

 

["Peasant"]

+Support
With a growing number of ECA’s and OA’s this suggestion is needed. The 2 slot cap was made when Jr. CL4 positions were still limited, therefore rendering the 2 slot system outdated.

 

[Michael Dzhetnikov]

This will get denied smh

 

[Hypnotoad]

+ Support

No real valid reason to deny this (Change my mind)

 

[Scopes]

+Support

Akavir approves this message.

 

[Thorn]

+support

 

[Claire!]

+Support
As Much as I really want this its gonna be denied, when the SC/SA rework came out, they changed the slots because it was taking too much duties. I want this but its gonna be denied

 

[Cloak]

there are not enough slots for available players to use.

This has been said multiple times before, we don't accept 'add more slot' suggestions that use 'there aren't enough slots for players' as a justification, the point of a slot cap is to help appropriately control roleplay ingame by ensuring we don't have too many of a certain group or rank running around on the server. We don't increase caps just because they're being hit constantly - that's their entire purpose.

You haven't really provided any other logic to support this, a suggestion to change the slot cap based on 'because the cap gets full' generally gets auto-denied unless you explain why it is actually needed and how it will affect RP on the site.

Not passing any judgement on whether it should be increased or not so please don't reply to me with "wtf clok you always auto deny IDIOT", just saying you need to give a better reason, seeing thread #512 asking for a job cap to get increased "because there aren't enough slots" gets a bit monotonous.

 

[Gizzmo]

+support
Also increase the number on A-1 specialist jobs because theres not enough slots.

but honestly, OAs/ECAs have as of late become more competent and useful, giving them another slot so that dedicated mains of these positions can play more frequently and help out is a net good. shouldn't go over 3 tho.