Denied Add Sexual Assault back to the arrest reasons

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Aleem Abdul

Head Moderator
Head Moderator
MilitaryRP Staff
Content Team
May 16, 2023
312
43
61
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
It adds back the reason of sexual assault to the jailing reasons

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?: No


Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Adds more realism to bases as sexual assault would not be tolerated in a military base
Would specify how to punish someone with suggested and maximum time for such a crime

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
People may be upset as they can no longer get away with sexual assaulting people in base

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It use to be an arrest reason, i do not know why it was removed as it is a very common problem encountered within bases especially lately as i joined RMP and experienced much of this personally.
 
Upvote 2
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
Dec 28, 2021
47
4
91
17
Poland
i find this insensitive as i was sexually assaulted earlier and did not have an arrest reason, i think you should considers others experiences before commenting on something you dont know anything about, i find this very hurtful being a victim of this in game.
Hangup that computer call and come kiss me on my hot mouth, i'm feeling romantical ?

+Support
 

Deleted member 1078

Guest
If this is a legitimate issue I'm pretty sure staff can just give them a 2 week ban for targeted harrasment lol
 
Jan 29, 2023
199
36
41
Suggestion Denied



Hi @Aleem Abdul , Your suggestion has been denied.

First thing, it's RMP/AOR's and HC's choice to edit the law book not content teams.
However, this suggestion would go against our overall server guidelines - so this is not something that can be added.

Thank you for taking the time to make a suggestion​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.