What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion would add elastic cuffs to the spawning loadout of Deep Covers.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I believe that this was not suggested before.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Being more balanced with other roles that have a disguise card and are expected to "infiltrate" areas. Such as: O-1/A-1 specialist, all of External Affairs, all of Internal Affairs, UNGOC Assessment Team (which is the most similar to Deep Cover) and UNGOC Field Operatives.
(I believe this is an exception for "<X> Class / Faction has this, we should have <X>" as it universal for similar roles.)
Making it easier for staff to do refunds, as Deep covers always use Elastic Restraints.
Deep Cover being able to access one of the core parts of their role without having to wait for 15 minutes each time to dispense Elastic Restraints.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
I have been thinking about making this suggestion for months, and I can not think of a single reason this would have any negatives.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I believe that the reasons above draw their own conclusions, but for a summary:
Deep covers being offered the same tools (on spawn) as their counterparts, being an easy implementation, and not drastically changing anything about the fundamentals of the role, for this is why I assume this is an easy decision for the Content Team.
This suggestion would add elastic cuffs to the spawning loadout of Deep Covers.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
I believe that this was not suggested before.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Being more balanced with other roles that have a disguise card and are expected to "infiltrate" areas. Such as: O-1/A-1 specialist, all of External Affairs, all of Internal Affairs, UNGOC Assessment Team (which is the most similar to Deep Cover) and UNGOC Field Operatives.
(I believe this is an exception for "<X> Class / Faction has this, we should have <X>" as it universal for similar roles.)
Making it easier for staff to do refunds, as Deep covers always use Elastic Restraints.
Deep Cover being able to access one of the core parts of their role without having to wait for 15 minutes each time to dispense Elastic Restraints.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
I have been thinking about making this suggestion for months, and I can not think of a single reason this would have any negatives.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I believe that the reasons above draw their own conclusions, but for a summary:
Deep covers being offered the same tools (on spawn) as their counterparts, being an easy implementation, and not drastically changing anything about the fundamentals of the role, for this is why I assume this is an easy decision for the Content Team.
Last edited: