Denied Change War Abuse

[MLGMagicHoodini]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Don't allow people to constantly change the war just cause they don't like it or something, keep it randomized

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Don't think so?

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
More diversity
Less chance for early base raid
More fair for both sides

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Some people aren't going to like some wars, but deal with it
Chance for a less fun and more boring war

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
I don't like how people be asking to change wars, and sometimes in order to benefit them so they can cap more points, or to get a early base raid, by capping all points faster, also I like S&D, CTF can be fun, if it was improved somehow, KC can be buggy, but it's still cool

 

[drako dormus]

-support
If 1 side has done there best during conquests these wars can absulutely destroy there process to a baseraid.
Base raids are already realy rare before the game mode update but now they are more like a legendary charizard then rare. (a naturale baseraid i mean)

 

[Levi]

-support
say there is 8 people on each side and it is a 3 lane conquest, it would be boring, same if there was 20 people on each side and it is a kc: simply removes enjoyment of the players. However, letting Senior Leadership change it will make it fit for the player numbers

 

[core]

I'd say -support cuz I don't like the war types, but I think that it should only be changed if a majority of both sides agree, it should ask each side individually if they want the other war type, as to not give either side an advantage that the other couldn't oppose. Asking each side individually could prevent a faction from outnumbering the other and just skipping war to something preferable

 

[MLGMagicHoodini]

-support
say there is 8 people on each side and it is a 3 lane conquest, it would be boring, same if there was 20 people on each side and it is a kc: simply removes enjoyment of the players. However, letting Senior Leadership change it will make it fit for the player numbers

Funny, cause when it was S&D with 3 Points active, and only like 10 NATO or something, all the NWO wanted S&D, even tho it was tottaly unfair for NATO

 

[MLGMagicHoodini]

-support
If 1 side has done there best during conquests these wars can absulutely destroy there process to a baseraid.
Base raids are already realy rare before the game mode update but now they are more like a legendary charizard then rare. (a naturale baseraid i mean)

I don't mean that, yes they can do it, but forcing a gamemode, to make the base raid faster shouldn't be allowed imo, takes the fun out

 

[MLGMagicHoodini]

I'd say -support cuz I don't like the war types, but I think that it should only be changed if a majority of both sides agree, it should ask each side individually if they want the other war type, as to not give either side an advantage that the other couldn't oppose. Asking each side individually could prevent a faction from outnumbering the other and just skipping war to something preferable

That's a good approach too

 

[Alexandria]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi @MLGMagicHoodini ,
Your suggestion has been denied.
This is because, on usual circumstances we do not change the type of game mode unless it is clear the player base wants this, the reason we decided to force conquest today was to create hype and generate interest for players to join the server.
I appreciate this may seem frustrating to you, but as a Server Leadership team will always try to make the most out of rare circumstances
Thank you for taking the time to make a suggestion​