What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Adding code to cell doors, this is the cell doors for when Foundation staff are arrested. Not hostage holding areas.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not that I have seen.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
It prevents anyone with a CL3+ keycard (which is many) entering Interro and just letting people out for the sake of it. (Has happened around 15-20 times in the last month)
Prevents people who have committed unethical actions from being released when they should not.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
If an ambassador or director from IA not around and someone needs to be let out for some reason, have to ask other foundation staff.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It makes sense to have a code for IA Ambassadors+ to prevent the cells being opened for silly reasons. Just makes sense to have the jail area actually secured
Adding code to cell doors, this is the cell doors for when Foundation staff are arrested. Not hostage holding areas.
Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Not that I have seen.
Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
It prevents anyone with a CL3+ keycard (which is many) entering Interro and just letting people out for the sake of it. (Has happened around 15-20 times in the last month)
Prevents people who have committed unethical actions from being released when they should not.
Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
If an ambassador or director from IA not around and someone needs to be let out for some reason, have to ask other foundation staff.
Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
It makes sense to have a code for IA Ambassadors+ to prevent the cells being opened for silly reasons. Just makes sense to have the jail area actually secured
Last edited: