Accepted DEA required licenses

This suggestion has been accepted for future development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Require licenses for flagging into certain Department of External Affairs jobs, similarly to how Autorifleman requires a Heavy Weapons License and the Marksman requires a Sniper License, or at least respective licenses to utilize the combat loadouts for each respective job.

DEA Senior Agent - Heavy Weapons License (Combat - M249 Para)
DEA Special Agent, Agency Manager, Deputy Director, Director - Sniper License (Combat - DSR)

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
-Mitigates friendly fire and other similar instances of mishandling the aforementioned weapons
-More effort and competency required to unlock access to these powerful weapons

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
-Existing DEA Senior Agents+ without their respective licenses will be forced to acquire them to flag onto the job

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
This addition won’t likely negatively impact DEA at all, as it serves to simply equalize the similar requirements for other Foundation combatant departments and mandate some training on how DEA personnel must properly handle weapons.
 
Do you think this will fix anything? They are already whitelisted jobs so whenever someone gets promoted will simply get the license straight away as there's no training for them and Sr. CL4 can give people licenses
- Support
There isn’t anything to “fix”. It’s simply enforcing a standard that exists across all Foundation jobs, and it’s been a standard for a good reason.
 

Stabby

Well-known Member
Apr 6, 2022
49
7
41
+Support
- No negatives
- Helps to set a standard that is already seen throughout the server
 

Blondie

Well-known Member
Mar 9, 2022
158
5
41
22
Sweden
Suggestion Approved

Hi @grunger ,

Thanks for taking the time to make a server suggestion.

Your suggestion will now be locked and marked as accepted.​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.