Denied Disallow armored vehicles on machinery defense missions

[Sceptre]

What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Disallow the use of armored vehicles to destroy/protect machinery in machinery defense vehicles. This includes tanks and helicopters.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
+ Machinery defense missions last longer
+ Machinery defense missions are fairer

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
- I don't see any cons.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Machinery defense missions usually result in one side pulling out boxers or a BTR to wipe the opposing side's machinery, which I believe is unfair considering it is not easily defendable that way if your regiment does not have access to explosives such as AT4s/RPGs

 

[Bogdan]

+Support
If you're in trouble he will save the day.
He's brave and he's fearless, come what may.
Without him the mission would go astray.

He's Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
Without him life would be much grimmer.
He's handsome, trim, and no-one slimmer.
He will never need a zimmer.

He's Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
More reliable than a garden strimmer.
He's never been mistaken for Yul Brynner.
He's not bald, and his head doesn't glimmer.

Master of the wit and the repartee.
His command of space directives is uncanny.
How come he's such a genius?
Don't ask me!

Ask Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
He's also a fantastic swimmer.
And if you play your cards right
Then he just might come round for dinner.

He's Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
No rhymes left now apart from quimmer.
We hope they fade us out before we get to "schlimmer".
Fade out you stupid blimmer!

 

[Sceptre]

+Support
If you're in trouble he will save the day.
He's brave and he's fearless, come what may.
Without him the mission would go astray.

He's Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
Without him life would be much grimmer.
He's handsome, trim, and no-one slimmer.
He will never need a zimmer.

He's Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
More reliable than a garden strimmer.
He's never been mistaken for Yul Brynner.
He's not bald, and his head doesn't glimmer.

Master of the wit and the repartee.
His command of space directives is uncanny.
How come he's such a genius?
Don't ask me!

Ask Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
He's also a fantastic swimmer.
And if you play your cards right
Then he just might come round for dinner.

He's Arnold, Arnold, Arnold Rimmer.
No rhymes left now apart from quimmer.
We hope they fade us out before we get to "schlimmer".
Fade out you stupid blimmer!

I fucking love you

 

[tony schleck]

-support
i mean take out a armored vehicle yourself
and they take a risk of taking a tank out for a mission

regarding health i think it is fine too

 

[WotInkermnation]

-support

 

[m0ka]

-support

 

[vlad the comunist]

-support

 

[Sceptre]

-support
i mean take out a armored vehicle yourself
and they take a risk of taking a tank out for a mission

regarding health i think it is fine too

This isn't viable when it comes to a regiment that doesn't have access to armored vehicles or the means to get rid of their armored vehicles.

 

[Osoi]

-support

 

[david blane]

This isn't viable when it comes to a regiment that doesn't have access to armored vehicles or the means to get rid of their armored vehicles.

What reg u in?

 

[Sceptre]

What reg u in?

USAF. We don't deploy aircraft for a machinery defense mission.

 

[Osoi]

This isn't viable when it comes to a regiment that doesn't have access to armored vehicles or the means to get rid of their armored vehicles.

Your means of getting rid of it is cas

 

[Michael J]

-support

1 or 2 humvee's can solve the problem, or if you have the dono pack you can just take a bradly. No need to ban armored vehicles when other things can do the trick

 

[Mr Apple]

-support

 

[Redrrx]

Brutha that's the whole point of the regiment its to use their abilities and also they are taking the risk to take those out if you dont realise

 

[Toddy]

-support

 

[Jack G]

Suggestion Denied​

---

Hi Alfred,
Your suggestion has been denied. We will continue to monitor the current way that CMISSIONS work with Amoured Vehicles however due to the amount of negative support for this suggestion, we will be denying this.

Thanks, Content Team​