Denied E-11 LCZ Spawn

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 16, 2023
44
8
21
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion would add an additional spawn location somewhere within LCZ. The ideal location would be the SS as it was before. Additionally it could be in the Additional Armoury near SCP-914. It currently takes 2 minutes to go from E-11 bunks to Old HCZ Checkpoint (with doors open). This makes gameplay repetitive and tiresome when SCPs have breached into LCZ or even into EZ.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Faster E-11 response times/ faster recontainments
Improve E-11's mental state and the gameplay loop

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Less fun for SCPs
May cause less E-11 to be in HCZ

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
The positives vastly outweigh the negatives here. Given the size of the new HCZ, without a LCZ spawn, E-11 is going to be come less useful and restricted. Breaches will last longer and may be worse.
 

Moon

Well-known Member
Jul 12, 2022
195
57
41
+support
pure aids trying to RC a breach while dying over and over again and running for so long to just die. a lot of e-11 are leaving mid breach or even leaving the reg because of this
 

Chad

Civil Gamers Expert
Jan 27, 2022
689
152
91
+support but would be bad for ci
 
Last edited:

KFC is LIFE

Well-known Member
Jun 18, 2022
149
30
41
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
This suggestion would add an additional spawn location somewhere within LCZ. The ideal location would be the SS as it was before. Additionally it could be in the Additional Armoury near SCP-914. It currently takes 2 minutes to go from E-11 bunks to Old HCZ Checkpoint (with doors open). This makes gameplay repetitive and tiresome when SCPs have breached into LCZ or even into EZ.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
Faster E-11 response times/ faster recontainments
Improve E-11's mental state and the gameplay loop

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
Less fun for SCPs
May cause less E-11 to be in HCZ

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
The positives vastly outweigh the negatives here. Given the size of the new HCZ, without a LCZ spawn, E-11 is going to be come less useful and restricted. Breaches will last longer and may be worse.
Although I agree with this, I think you need to review the "Possible negatives of the suggestion" as I can think of two:
•CM/CS would have to have new bunks constructed, which might mean a room in Medbay will have to go and Containment Specialist will have to spawn with GS again;
•They'd have to create said bunks, it would take time and effort to construct some bunks for E-11 to use;

Based on the positives and the negatives I still massively feel like this should be done. However, the question is where?
 

Jonas Enry

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
SCP-RP Staff
Resources Team
Donator
Mar 4, 2023
279
52
21
Ireland
Although I agree with this, I think you need to review the "Possible negatives of the suggestion" as I can think of two:
•CM/CS would have to have new bunks constructed, which might mean a room in Medbay will have to go and Containment Specialist will have to spawn with GS again;
•They'd have to create said bunks, it would take time and effort to construct some bunks for E-11 to use;

Based on the positives and the negatives I still massively feel like this should be done. However, the question is where?
They could use the lower armoury for them and it would only need to be a bed or two as it’s not primary bunks
 
Jan 16, 2023
44
8
21
Although I agree with this, I think you need to review the "Possible negatives of the suggestion" as I can think of two:
•CM/CS would have to have new bunks constructed, which might mean a room in Medbay will have to go and Containment Specialist will have to spawn with GS again;
•They'd have to create said bunks, it would take time and effort to construct some bunks for E-11 to use;

Based on the positives and the negatives I still massively feel like this should be done. However, the question is where?

Yes it is definitely a concern.

E-11 primary bunks are so large there would be little need for a fleshed out secondary bunks.

As Jonas said the LCZ Lower Armoury could be used, replacing the prop boxes currently in it with a spawn point.

DEA's secondary spawn is just in garage as well with no bunks so it could even be a spawn and nothing else.
 

egg.

Well-known Member
Mar 4, 2023
41
12
41
Spain
+ Support
It genuinely feels stupid when people auth AA with E-11 prioritised when we can’t even get to AA in the first place
 
Although I agree with this, I think you need to review the "Possible negatives of the suggestion" as I can think of two:
•CM/CS would have to have new bunks constructed, which might mean a room in Medbay will have to go and Containment Specialist will have to spawn with GS again;
•They'd have to create said bunks, it would take time and effort to construct some bunks for E-11 to use;

Based on the positives and the negatives I still massively feel like this should be done. However, the question is where?

Could just let us spawn in the same bunks as them, really wouldnt change much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.