Denied End Campaigns after a 100 Point difference

This suggestion has been denied and will not receive development.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jason M.

Jason M.

Civil Gamers Expert
Three Year Club Conversation Starter
Jul 10, 2021
466
88
111
What does this suggestion change/add/remove:
Allows (If both Senior HC + SL agree) for a side that is suffering from atleast a 100 campaign score difference to end a campaign early through a forced baseraid (Similar to what happened a few days back).
This could also be in the form of:
- Ending a campaign when a team reaches 150/100 campaign score first
- Ending a campaign after a team secures 3 natural base raids

Has something similar been suggested before? If so, why is your suggestion different?:
Idfk probably.

Possible Positives of the suggestion (At least 2):
-Losing sides get a fighting chance again
-Its more fun to actually play as both sides are competing
-More motivation to fight since when there's a week left in a campaign and a 100 point diff, there is NOTHING you can do to win.

Possible Negatives of the suggestion:
-Needs to be monitored by SL to avoid abuse.

Based on the Positives & Negatives, why should this suggestion be accepted:
Do you like playing this campaign? I don't.
No one in NATO is enjoying it.
USSR is getting bored.
The first week of a campaign is always the most fun for a reason.

Watch Garry's Mod (x64) 2025-02-26 18-59-39 | Streamable

Watch "Garry's Mod (x64) 2025-02-26 18-59-39" on Streamable.
streamable.com
 
Upvote 2
This suggestion has been closed. Votes are no longer accepted.
Levi

Levi

Civil Gamers Expert
One Year Club Conversation Starter Advent 2024
Mar 15, 2023
159
21
61
Neutral
I do like this idea however there are a few variables that could make a drastic negative effect. Not using this as an excuse however NATO consistently struggle either way. They lose almost every war so even if the map was reset, within a week the same result will occur. This loop would be quite boring for the player base, let alone a base raid every week where there is practically nothing they can do. However, this change could be pointless as one side can simply refuse to have a base raid and the server will just stay the same as before this change.
Edit: I can't read as Jason said below, changed accordingly
 
Jason M.

Jason M.

Civil Gamers Expert
Three Year Club Conversation Starter
Jul 10, 2021
466
88
111
Levi said:
Neutral
I do like this idea however there are a few variables that could make a drastic negative effect. Not using this as an excuse however NATO consistently struggle either way. They lose almost every war so even if the map was reset, within a week the same result will occur. This loop would be quite boring for the player base, let alone a base raid every week where there is practically nothing they can do. The only thing I would change however is for SL and both HC teams to approve it so that any abuse from this action won't be caused. However, this change could be pointless as one side can simply refuse to have a base raid and the server will just stay the same as before this change.
Click to expand...
This guy just didn't even read the first sentence of the suggestion.
 
Jason M.

Jason M.

Civil Gamers Expert
Three Year Club Conversation Starter
Jul 10, 2021
466
88
111
Auburn said:
How would this work to the campaign schedule? Would it extend the next campaign duration? Would the remaining campaign days not be counted?
Click to expand...
Idk man whatever fix requires no dev time
(Since were not getting it if there is any dev time)


King Jez said:
very valid suggestion but its a quick fix to a major problem
Click to expand...
MRP needs quick fixes, no other fixes available atm.
 
Jack G

Jack G

Senior Administrator
Senior Administrator
MilitaryRP Staff
Content Team
Donator
One Year Club Two Year Club Three Year Club Conversation Starter
Feb 19, 2021
339
108
111
Suggestion Denied​
Hi Jason M,
Your suggestion has been denied. This would be too unstructured for it to be worth doing as it also relies on a community supervisor being available basically 24/7. We are making steps to make campaigns closer and more balanced, of which I'll link the github issue for you.

Campaign Balancing · Issue #396 · civilnetworks-projects/MRP_Public_Development_Tracker

Forum link Leave blank if not applicable. Enhancement description (1) Campaign score dependent on player count. E.g a war with 20 people would be worth less campaign score than a war with 75 people...
github.com
Thank you for taking the time to make a suggestion​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom